GPMark

Since GPMark on OS4Depot seems to be a non-optimized build (?), I made my own using source codes from Aminet. Source code version uses windowed resolution 320*240 and I have doubled that to 640*480 fullscreen, to match the OS4Depot version. Now it also prints the screen resolution and results to the console.

This version was built with GCC 4.2.4 using -O2. It is faster on my Sam440EP than the original OS4Depot version.

Get the binary + sources here: http://capehill.kapsi.fi/gpmark/GPmark_OS4.lha

My results:

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 104.7
Plasma: 81.1
Rotozoomer: 78.4
Rotozoomer Near: 100.0
Rotozoomer Far: 52.0
Radial Blur: 17.9
3D Bunny: 7.9

@Capehill

mmm...
dunno how a gpmark benchmarks have to be compiled...

In theory it have to be much standard as possible to compare results on every system compiled right?

I man on my benchamerk test if we use gpmark to made comparisions it have to be compiled "same" way on every system....

How to do that?

Do you think your compile was much standard than the other? or not?

Can you check someway the os3.x/mos/aros ports to see compile differences?

@Tuxedo

I don't know what is resolution used for example in MOS port (you have to ask). If it's 320*240 then you are comparing different things because OS4depot version uses 640*480.

That's why I added a print in my build. No need to guess.

My version is comparable to OS4depot version, that's all I can say.

@Capehill

Thanks !

X1000 with Radeon HD R7 250:

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 187.0
Plasma: 159.0
Rotozoomer: 173.6
Rotozoomer Near: 174.7
Rotozoomer Far: 173.5
Radial Blur: 77.7
3D Bunny: 43.6

Sam 440ep @733 Mhz (o/c witrh FSB & PCI @ 122Mhz) with radeon M9:

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 102.3
Plasma: 80.7
Rotozoomer: 76.5
Rotozoomer Near: 99.0
Rotozoomer Far: 50.1
Radial Blur: 17.7
3D Bunny: 7.6

X1000 with R7 240

8> GPMark
GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 196.2
Plasma: 166.0
Rotozoomer: 181.1
Rotozoomer Near: 181.1
Rotozoomer Far: 181.7
Radial Blur: 78.2
3D Bunny: 44.6

@Capehill

X5000 with R7 250

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 411.8
Plasma: 259.1
Rotozoomer: 316.1
Rotozoomer Near: 321.5
Rotozoomer Far: 308.5
Radial Blur: 78.4
3D Bunny: 39.8

@Tuxedo

Don't that depends on what you wont to test?

I general most powerpc exe files wont be optimized.

@LiveForIt

exactly

since I opened tehe topic(as you probably know):

http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/v ... t=0&viewmode=flat&order=0

And want to make tests much exactly possible, I found that GPMark with about same date on AmiNET, OS4Depot, and AROS Archives so thinked that they was about same "compile" and good to do tests...
However now that thread make me doubts on that...
Can you maybe check on the above archives if they can be compared effectively or better to remove the benchmark from my thread plz if that wasnt so complex?

Thank you for any statement/help on that.

@Tuxedo

X1000 with Radeon HD4650

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 815.9
Plasma: 477.3
Rotozoomer: 620.3
Rotozoomer Near: 625.2
Rotozoomer Far: 625.3
Radial Blur: 119.2
3D Bunny: 56.9

@Capehill

X5000/020 R7-265
GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 458.7
Plasma: 291.5
Rotozoomer: 356.5
Rotozoomer Near: 362.7
Rotozoomer Far: 346.8
Radial Blur: 90.1
3D Bunny: 46.0

Tabor A1222 R7-265 (Not Optimized - Early Version OS4)
GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 171.2
Plasma: 127.5
Rotozoomer: 122.7
Rotozoomer Near: 144.9
Rotozoomer Far: 89.4
Radial Blur: 39.3
3D Bunny: 18.0

Sam460 HD7750
GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 145.0
Plasma: 110.8
Rotozoomer: 113.1
Rotozoomer Near: 128.5
Rotozoomer Far: 94.9
Radial Blur: 26.9
3D Bunny: 9.4

On my Pegasos2 G4@1131MHz / Radeon9000pro i got:

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 234.2
Plasma: 183.1
Rotozoomer: 214.5
Rotozoomer Near: 221.4
Rotozoomer Far: 214.2
Radial Blur: 21.4
3D Bunny: 11.5

X5000 R9 280x

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 457.0
Plasma: 290.4
Rotozoomer: 355.1
Rotozoomer Near: 361.4
Rotozoomer Far: 345.5
Radial Blur: 83.8
3D Bunny: 43.2

SAM460ex/PPC460EX-1155MHZ/2048MB/RadeonHD6570:

["old" GPMark]
GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 396.6
Plasma: 221.7
Rotozoomer: 228.5
Rotozoomer Near: 301.8
Rotozoomer Far: 162.8
Radial Blur: 30.7
3D Bunny: 9.4
#

[new GPMark]
#GPMark_320_240_window
GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 320 * 240
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: window
Blitting Test: 333.6
Plasma: 263.6
Rotozoomer: 276.8
Rotozoomer Near: 287.8
Rotozoomer Far: 230.0
Radial Blur: 78.6
3D Bunny: 6.6
#GPMark_640_480_fullscreen
GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 640 * 480
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: fullscreen
Blitting Test: 255.0
Plasma: 144.8
Rotozoomer: 145.2
Rotozoomer Near: 198.7
Rotozoomer Far: 106.5
Radial Blur: 19.9
3D Bunny: 6.4
#


EDIT: added "GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12" results.

X1000/Radeon 4850

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 817.7
Plasma: 475.0
Rotozoomer: 620.3
Rotozoomer Near: 628.1
Rotozoomer Far: 626.8
Radial Blur: 118.2
3D Bunny: 57.3

A new version is available:

***

2018-Jan-12
- Fixed radial blur in 640 * 480 (still some issues)
- Fixed some compiler warnings
- Added error print for file open failures
- Compiled 320 * 240 window mode binary
- Added SDL surface info logging

***

My Sam440 results:

GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 320 * 240
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: window
Blitting Test: 150.9
Plasma: 135.1
Rotozoomer: 135.1
Rotozoomer Near: 145.2
Rotozoomer Far: 108.9
Radial Blur: 63.1
3D Bunny: 8.3

GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 640 * 480
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: fullscreen
Blitting Test: 107.1
Plasma: 81.6
Rotozoomer: 79.4
Rotozoomer Near: 99.8
Rotozoomer Far: 53.7
Radial Blur: 18.0
3D Bunny: 8.1

X1000 with Radeon 4850 gfx card running FE1

GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 640 * 480
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: fullscreen
Blitting Test: 1082.3
Plasma: 544.3
Rotozoomer: 731.8
Rotozoomer Near: 736.4
Rotozoomer Far: 733.5
Radial Blur: 124.2
3D Bunny: 58.4

@sundown

Are you kidding me?

You got a 6x better results in the blitting area than my setup

X1000 with Radeon HD7750 ith OS4FE1

GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 640 * 480
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: fullscreen
Blitting Test: 180.3
Plasma: 150.9
Rotozoomer: 166.6
Rotozoomer Near: 167.0
Rotozoomer Far: 160.5
Radial Blur: 76.5
3D Bunny: 42.4


Why is there such a massive difference, even if i have the more powerfull gfx card?

Is it because it's software rendering only?
But even then there shouldn't be such a big gap...

edit: typo

@Raziel

I find it strange as well, can't explain it. Join IRC...


@all

I think all testers should also state if their running FE1 with enhancer or without & also what version of the Radeon driver used. In my case, no enhancer & Radeon driver v2.11.

my X1000, RadeonHD 7950, OS4.1 FE Update 1, enhancer:

GPmark: width 640, height 480, flags 0x80000000
Blitting Test: 156.0
Plasma: 131.8
Rotozoomer: 144.1
Rotozoomer Near: 145.9
Rotozoomer Far: 143.9
Radial Blur: 62.0
3D Bunny: 35.8

@ sundown

you sure you have a Radeon HD4850 ???

@328gts

You didn't say what radeon driver version you're using...

Yes, I just built a Ryzen 6 core PC & needed my r9 270 for that, put my old 4850 back in. I'm running the test from RAM, not sure if that affects it, doubt it though. Enhancer has the new radeon drivers, was just wondering if it made a difference. Ami603 in post #9 is getting the same results as me on his x1k.

320x240 windows test

GPmark improved, version: 2018 January 12
Surface dimensions: 320 * 240
Surface is located in RAM
Surface must be locked: false
Display mode: window
Blitting Test: 311.4
Plasma: 288.0
Rotozoomer: 288.3
Rotozoomer Near: 295.4
Rotozoomer Far: 298.5
Radial Blur: 194.5
3D Bunny: 46.7