Warp3D SI : The fastest card

I have "new" Supermicro RSC RR1UE-AXL( PCI-e 8x -> PCI-X 133 Mhz Adapter) for sale and Extender cable and "new" radeon 9250 256mb 128bit if anyone interested
More infor here
http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum ... t_id=86990#forumpost87166
Regards
Jose

Owner: TiredOfLife
HW: Sam460cr with Radeon HD7770
cow3d: 120FPS or 150FPS after pressing B.

Owner: Sofistisoftware
HW: Sam460ex 1.15 Ghz with Club3D Radeon R7 250E
ioquake3 from HunoPPc 1280, 32bit, high texture and details: 26.4 fps (with Candy Backdrops active) and 27.1 without Candy

@Hans

I can confirm when the gfx memory if full until 256Kb my system freeze, i tried it with urban terror and gfx docky, aos4.1fe and Warp3d driver v1.8

@All

the IOQuake port from juha.niemimaki is better than Huno, the sky is high quality and the filter/texture too, I don't know if it possible to have in Huno's port

@sofistisoftware

It's not a IOQuake problem, the Huno version of the game was really high optimized, but current driver are not :-/

On the same machine MorphOS 3.8 give you more than 100 FPS (at the same video resolution and with a worse video card) so you can imagine how mutch we can (theorically) obtain ...

@sofistisoftware

Thanks I tried Juha ioQuake it works well.
It is slower than HunoPPC's version.

X1000 timedemo, demo four.
Huno 52fps
Juha 46fps

@ddni

Yes it's true, but check the quality of the sky and try to see the floor or the walls very near, they've a better look

Universe Two by Crisot can be used for benchmarking pure Warp3D as can his Pxs-engine. It might also answer if there is something funny going on with Cow 3D.

Tested on X1000 witth R9 280 @850Mhz.

Universe Two: 72.893491 fps

Pxs-Engine has 2 executables. PXS_Ship renders 387 co-ordinates and 608 indics while PXS_Multiships renders 1935 co-ordinats and 3040 indices. I tested all resolutions available to me apart from 16-bit modes. I tested just once in each resolution rather than average multiple runs since the variation is so low there's no point.

I know some of you have 4x monitors so it would be interesting to see if the fps stay level all the way to 4x on your systems.

Pxs_Ship;

640x480x32: 72.823372 fps
800x600x32: 72.252017 fps
1024x768x32: 60.054924 fps
1152x864x32: 59.818174 fps
1280x720x32: 59.825574 fps
1280x800x32: 60.014453 fps
1280x960x32: 60.063571 fps
1280x1024x32: 60.063743 fps
1440x900x32: 60.160621 fps
1600x900x32: 59.867207 fps
1600x1200x32: 60.039655 fps
1680x1050x32: 59.884414 fps
1920x1200x32: 59.937315 fps

Pxs_Multi_Ships;

640x480x32: 75.015544 fps
800x600x32: 72.208206 fps
1024x768x32: 60.036888 fps
1152x864x32: 59.831259 fps
1280x720x32: 59.834494 fps
1280x800x32: 59.982838 fps
1280x960x32: 60.034092 fps
1280x1024x32: 60.064502 fps
1440x900x32: 60.138790 fps
1600x900x32: 59.867103 fps
1600x1200x32: 60.102927 fps
1600x1050x32: 59.902866 fps
1900x1200x32: 59.952533 fps

@Rob


Sam460, HD7770

Universe Two 112.635087

PXS Ship
640x480x32 142.824281
1024x768x32 118.930740
1920x1080x32 119.487967


PXS Multi
640x480x32 117.111629
1024x768x32 113.173171
1920x1080x32 115.085856


Cheers

Just got myself an passive SAPPHIRE HD 7750 1GB GDDR5 ULTIMATE
http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentat ... &sgid=1159&pid=1471&lid=1

Its a bit slower then my 6850 but at least it has a warp3d driver :) and draws much less power. Also its passive. But the 6850 fans were really silent too. I tried q2 and q3 and the fly :)

Here benchmarks from Hans page

6850 - 7,410,45 points
http://hdrlab.org.nz/benchmark/gfxbench2d/OS/AmigaOS/Result/1628

7750 - 6,862,61
http://hdrlab.org.nz/benchmark/gfxbench2d/OS/AmigaOS/Result/1629

Computer: X1000 ofcourse
Cowdemo gave me: 93 fps
Quake3 timedemo 1 / demo four: 43.1 fps at 1280x1024 basic settings

Took me sometime to understand what to type in console, i googled and some said type demo001, demo 1 etc and finally i read here says demo four :p Im happy to finally have one less limit with my amiga. Warp3d check :)

I get 59.xxxx everytime. No matter what resolution. Get this on both files. :-/

@Antique

Same here.

@TiredOfLife

Quote:

So at least that confirms there's a bottleneck somewhere on the X1000. Hopefully it can be rectified at some point.

Did you test any higher resolutions to see how PXS scales on your system?

@Rob

Ok added two more to the above.

Cheers

@All
If someone have somewhere in benchmarks all the time something around 50-70 fps, then it can be just you have enabled VSYNC option (or in the prefs of app you test, or in the system somewhere). For bench-marking it should be off.

@Rob

looks very much like vsync is enabled in these demos. I also get 60fps across all resolutions.

@ddni
The question is why TiredOfLife have different results.. My guess, that somewhere in the radeon drivers tooltype someone have VSYNC enabled or something, while other ones are not.

Quote:

I see I'm not the only impatient guy with a HD6850 that couldn't wait waiting for a HD7950 to arrive here to finally start messing with real 3d again.....

@328gts

Im tired of waiting. I dont even remember how many years now.
I was thinking first getting 7850/7870 or 270/280 card but i saw an add for 87 euro so .... go and get it :) Warp3d check.

Now next wait is os4.2 with new gfx system :) and octamed