Mesa : first update, v1.1

There is, first update ! Grab it from os4depot in upload query.

Change log:

=======================================================
glmark2 2023.01
=======================================================
OpenGL Information
GL_VENDOR: AMD
GL_RENDERER: POLARIS10 (radeonsi, polaris10, ACO, RM 3.0, 54.78 (3.1.2026) AmigaOne X5000 release)
GL_VERSION: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 26.1.5 (git-2e7650ee6e)
System Info: mesa.library 1.1 (1.9.2026), RadeonRX 2.23
Surface Config: buf=32 r=8 g=8 b=8 a=8 depth=24 stencil=0 samples=0
Surface Size: 800x600 windowed
=======================================================
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 415 FrameTime: 2.414 ms
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 7040 FrameTime: 0.142 ms
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 6469 FrameTime: 0.155 ms
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 6481 FrameTime: 0.154 ms
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 6446 FrameTime: 0.155 ms
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 6231 FrameTime: 0.161 ms
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 6232 FrameTime: 0.160 ms
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 6231 FrameTime: 0.160 ms
[shading] shading=cel: FPS: 6176 FrameTime: 0.162 ms
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 6066 FrameTime: 0.165 ms
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 6957 FrameTime: 0.144 ms
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 6902 FrameTime: 0.145 ms
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 4990 FrameTime: 0.200 ms
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 4809 FrameTime: 0.208 ms
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 4535 FrameTime: 0.221 ms
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 1827 FrameTime: 0.548 ms
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 1818 FrameTime: 0.550 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 179 FrameTime: 5.600 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 151 FrameTime: 6.637 ms
[buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 251 FrameTime: 3.991 ms
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 1026 FrameTime: 0.975 ms
[jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 2888 FrameTime: 0.346 ms
[terrain] <default>: FPS: 895 FrameTime: 1.117 ms
[shadow] <default>: FPS: 4074 FrameTime: 0.246 ms
[refract] <default>: FPS: 2168 FrameTime: 0.461 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 5867 FrameTime: 0.170 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 5838 FrameTime: 0.171 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 5857 FrameTime: 0.171 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 5868 FrameTime: 0.170 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 5829 FrameTime: 0.172 ms
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 5856 FrameTime: 0.171 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 5859 FrameTime: 0.171 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 5866 FrameTime: 0.170 ms
=======================================================
glmark2 Score: 4486
=======================================================


X5000, 8GB RX580

Keep up the great work!

Yeeehhhaaa!!

@kas1e

Thanks for the update!
All working.
x1000/RX580 glmark2 - 4228

@kas1e

Thanks for all the work on Mesa and the new 1.1 update. I love this stuff....

Thanks for your work on MESA project this will open few door for new Amiga things.

@kas1e
Thanks for the update and the Felix Workshop demo.

@kas1e

mesa.library 1.1 ( 1-09-2026)
Tried FixedGL on my SAM460ex + RX500 and some test I only get a black window on some tests:

Does Mesa v. 1.1 work with Radeon HD 6450 (Caicos)?

@Gregor
Quote:

As i aware Caicos is pre RadeonSI, is R600. This one i didn't touch in mesa at all. Maybe some old version of RadeonHD like 3.7 and pre did support it ? If so, i may need to enable r600 too, but then as i have no such card i can't test it properly..

@Jabirulo
Will have a look at, thanks. For sake of tests try it plz after reboot, to see if it random or stable reproduced.

@kas1e
since you stated that for HD cards the driver version 5.14 is
raccomanded I updated from 3.7 to 5.14.

But with glmark2 almost all tests run at lower FPS and the final score
is with 3.7 3040
with 5.14 2317
big difference do you know what can causing them?

System:
X1000 @ 1.9 Ghz Radeon SHAPPHIRE Vapor-X R7 250X (HD 7700)

FixedGL crash entire machine with 5.14, works with 3.7

@pvanny
There seems to be different results for different HD cards, for example see what i have for Oland Mobile:

R7-240 Oland Mob.
RadeonHD3.7 : 229 (yes that low)
RadeonHD5.20 : 967

From another side, that what i have for Verde Mob. card:

R7-250 Verde Mob.
RadeonHD3.7 : 2664
RadeonHD5.20 : 2073

So 3.7 can be faster in those tests glMark2 tests , but for example Q3 timedemo Verde Mob on 5.20 : 127 fps, but on 3.7 115 fps.

But what is for sure, that it looks like card depends too. At least for Oland on x1000 3.7 for Oland is no go (and same results i have without mesa too, like just with warp3dnova/ogles2).

Quote:

Need crash log, and if tried you after reboot too ?

@All

I would like to see the difference between RX 2.12 and 2.23 on the Sam460.
Could somebody please test for me?

Cheers

@TiredOfLife
I can made some tests later

@pvanni
I do check also gl4es version of glmark2 on my x1000 (some tests dind't compiles because of shaders, but most are), and so result with Verde card :

RadeonHD 3.7 : 1287
RadeonHD 5.20 : 1149

So actually, it start to looks like it family based. At least with Oland Mob. 5.20 is much better. For Verde, not so, and 3.7 there good enough as well, and while in some tests 5.20 better, in other ones 3.7 is better.

But that we tell only about glmark2. Game results compiled over gl4es so ogles2/warp3dnova are:

quake3:
5.20 - 107 fps
3.7 - 81 fps

spencer 1st level:
5.20 - ~57-58 fps
3.7 - 41-42 fps

foobillard:
5.20 - 80 fps
3.7 - 66 fps

So see, while glmark even over gl4es is worse a bit, in games difference is quite noticeable.

But that all to be tested with mesa too. But at least glmark2 be it gl4es or mesa, show a bit worse results in 5.20, while reallife show 5.20 as better.

But it's not THAT bad as i think before because of Oland only where difference is so big.