"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
I believe your address for general business of ACube is correct. My comment was based on Max's response to Jack, which was clearly about the CPUs. It MAY be a dedicated address that Max wishes to use for non-general business.
Let's wait for clarification from the source, as it is I who could be wrong about this.
Your remark is correct. This is the address (post 41, got a verification in PM by Elwood).
Jack
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
ive been in contact with a company in the USA who will for $500 usd upgrade my powerbook to a 2ghz cpu now i asked the question of them if it was possible to do this with my A1 module they said as long as its pin compatable yes for same money
the chip runs @1.64 v @ 2ghz so would be cooler than my current 1ghz A1 CPU interesting indeed
now the question is will this be pin compatible with my XEG4 module
Quoting freescale: Quote:
Offered in a 360-pin CBGA package, the MPC7447...
745X are 483-pin or something , sorry to disapoint you.
Jack
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
What ssolie was so delicately understating was that the GX is a buggy chip and well worth replacing with a GL. #6
Oh, the "fixes". What are the "consequences" of these bugs? (just curious)
Thanks,
Jack
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Yes, at the second attempt, it seems to work and is on its way back to me. It looks like we may have enough demand to force prices down from the suppliers, judging by the traffic here. let's hope that is the case.
Jack wrote: @number6 [quote] What ssolie was so delicately understating was that the GX is a buggy chip and well worth replacing with a GL. #6
Quote:
Oh, the "fixes". What are the "consequences" of these bugs? (just curious)
There are several documents available on GX "errata". Strangely, mine were freely and readily available when I hunted them down. Now (today), I notice a dead link on IBM's website, with the following message:
Quote:
Our Apologies
You have attempted to enter a controlled access area. IBM Microelectronics uses a entitlement process to protect potentially sensitive data.
That is, of course, management speak for "protecting info about our screwups."
Not surprisingly from a business who had Mai Logic for a partner.
It is well known, however, how much time the GX chip cost the project (OS4).
Maybe some developer would like to comment. I would rather not.