Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
20 user(s) are online (13 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 20

more...

Support us!

Headlines

 
  Register To Post  

Just an idea: Dynamic disk buffers?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Hi.
Would it be a good idea to add the feature of dynamic disk buffering to SFS, in order to reduce unecessary memory consumption in setups with many SFS partitions?

SFS would have to detect somehow if a partition is being accessed and whenever this happens, it would increase the read-ahead buffers for this partition (and the AmigaDos buffers if this is feasible) to a user defined amount.
When this partition is not accessed anymore, SFS would drop the buffers to a minimum.

Go to top
Re: Just an idea: Dynamic disk buffers?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@Amigamancer

What you describe could be achieved by a "global" dynamic cache (I think that the thing you describe is pretty similar to the practice of linux kernel ).
It can use the whole ram as a cache and free it on demand.

Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top
Re: Just an idea: Dynamic disk buffers?
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@Amigamancer

Sounds like the (OS4-SFS) diskcache.library.kmod to me.

Go to top
Re: Just an idea: Dynamic disk buffers?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@ZeroG

So, this OS4 system module adjusts the buffers of a partition depending on if it is being accessed or not? Ok. I didn't know this because i haven't bought it yet.

Go to top
Re: Just an idea: Dynamic disk buffers?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@Amigamancer

if your speaking about dosbuffers, not.

It adjust the read ahead cache system embedded in SFS (the way you/we adjust via SetCache or SFSConfig under 68k)

Go to top

  Register To Post

 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2024 The XOOPS Project