gcc 9 and 10

	Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic
Register To Post

« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 21 »

Capehill

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/4/19 13:58 #141

Just can't stay away

@walkero

Probably adding "extern" in global.h will help, and then defining those symbols in one C file only.

billyfish

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/4/19 14:08 #142

Just popping in

If you have a globals header file you can have something like


#ifndef DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS



#ifdef ALLOCATE_GLOBALS

    #define GLOBAL_PREFIX 

    #define GLOBAL_VAL(x)    = x

#else

    #define GLOBAL_PREFIX extern

    #define GLOBAL_VAL(x)

#endif



#endif         /* #ifndef DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS */



GLOBAL_PREFIX const char *G_NAME_S GLOBAL_VAL ("name");

GLOBAL_PREFIX int g_log_level GLOBAL_VAL (1);

then in one of the c source files have


#define ALLOCATE_GLOBALS (1)

before the

#include "globals.h"

line in that particular file and it will define and declare the variables just fine

walkero

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/4/19 16:01 #143

Site Builder

Thanks again for your proposals.
The reason I mentioned this problem in this thread is because I thought that this might be a problem of the GCC 10 itself. Let's don't derail the thread further.

I really appreciate your feedback guys. Thanks again.

Follow me on
Ko-fi, Twitter, YouTube, Twitch

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10

#144

@all

Since today a rather essential (at least for me) fix regarding dynamic casts/shared builds has been merged to adtools, could someone please compile a new version, so I can test locally?

Thanks a lot

See here: https://github.com/sba1/adtools/pull/101

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/18 19:55 #145

Just popping in

@Raziel

I'll see if I can get some time to do this during the weekend.

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10

#146

@sTix

Looking forward to it, thank you very much

If you don't find time, no problem...let's keep it fun

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/21 16:26 #147

Just popping in

@Raziel

Ok, I just did a blind build while at work. A haven't tested it at all so take it for what it is, it might kill your cat and steal your car:

https://github.com/sodero/adtools/releases/tag/10.3.0_2

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10

#148

@sTix

Whee, thanks...off to test...

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10

#149

@sTix

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/21 19:30 #150

Just popping in

@Raziel

Excellent :)

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10

#151

@sTix

Compiled a full scale ScummVM with all engines...that rc is working for me

Thank you very much

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/22 10:52 #152

Just popping in

@Raziel

Very good to hear. I'm finally preparing a PR for the main repo now so that we'll have less confusion and maintenance in the (hopefully no so distant) future.

Capehill

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/26 17:11 #153

Just can't stay away

@sTix

Thanks for the latest release. Compiled succesfully a couple of C++ projects.

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/26 19:23 #154

Just popping in

@Capehill

Nice. I opened a PR in the main repo for gcc 10. There was some confusion in that thread as to why this release works. Would be good to avoid that in the future :)

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

Posted on: 2021/6/1 17:44 #155

Just popping in

If anyone would like to try 11.1.0 out, a build can be found here:

https://github.com/sodero/adtools/releases/tag/10.3.0_1

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

#156

@sTix

Will do asap, but

1) Why is it tagged 10.3.0_1 (instead of 11.1.0) and
2) What are the differences to 10.3.0_2?
(https://github.com/sodero/adtools/releases/tag/10.3.0_2)

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

Posted on: 2021/6/2 11:51 #157

Just popping in

@Raziel

I just used that release as a dump for the binaries. 11.1.0 contains everything that 10.3.0_2 does. It's a mess that I should fix. I see that there's a Travis file in the adtools repo, but it seems broken. That should be fixed so that we could build rc:s, finals and so on and automatically publish them somewhere.

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

#158

@sTix

Understood, will get to testing tomorrow and report back.

Thank you

IamSONIC

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

Posted on: 2021/6/2 21:04 #159

Just popping in

@sTix

Quote:

If anyone would like to try 11.1.0 out, a build can be found here:

Thanks for the update! Tried compiling 2 projects. No problems.

I also tried "-flto" but it doesn't work when building natively.

Anonymous

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

#160

@IamSONIC

lto not working natively is a known bug.
There is either something missing natively or something broke while porting.

@sTix

Just did a full build of ScummVM with 11.1.0...works like a charm.

I can also report that -fanalyze is working, but it's not really something to use commonly, more like only for bug hunting, since it demands a lot of cpu power.

Register To Post	« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8) 9 10 11 ... 21 »
	Top Previous Topic Next Topic

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )