Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
156 user(s) are online (110 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 155

BSzili, more...

Headlines

 
  Register To Post  

JXFS - slow...missing a vital part?
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
I changed my SFS (not boot) partitions to JXFS and recopied
all of my backuped data.
Now nearly at the end of doing that, it seems i'm missing
some vital part to actually be able to use the speed of the
new JXFS, because right now its crawling slow

But maybe it's just me?

Is there some diskcache module (like in SFS) i forgot to
copy or something else i have to adjust to make it fly like
it's supposed to be? (But maybe it's not?)
In comparision even while copying data from one JXFS
partition to another SFS wins by a skyscraper, plus the fact
that while disk acesss (copying mainly) cpu useage seems to
go to 100%, i.e. TuneNet starts to studder until copying
finishes, every other apps (YAM, AWeb) running behave
suddenly sluggish like hell...

???

Help, what am i doing wrong, missing?

edit: OK, some more testing reveals that the 100% cpu useage
only happens whith copying in shell (i/o buffer buffer
problem?)


Edited by Raziel on 2008/9/7 19:14:28
People are dying.
Entire ecosystems are collapsing.
We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.
And all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth.
How dare you!
– Greta Thunberg
Go to top
Re: JXFS - slow...missing a vital part?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@Raziel

You lucky gringo, still waiting for my copy to arrive;-D

Quote:

edit: OK, some more testing reveals that the 100% cpu useage
only happens whith copying in shell (i/o buffer buffer
problem?)


Use "BUF" argument to verify :
Quote:

14.AOS4:> copy ?
FROM/M, TO/A, ALL/S, Q=QUIET/S, BUF=BUFFER/K/N, CLONE/S, DATES/S, NOPRO=NOPROTECTION/S, COM=COMMENT/S, NOREQ=NOREQUESTERS/S, NOREP=NOREPLACE/S, INTER=INTERACTIVE/S, FORCE/S, ARC=ARCHIVE/S, NEWER/S, COPYLINKS/S, FOLLOWLINKS/S:


And try to bennchmark f/s to ram and in wise versa.
About stutter: maybe something is unoptimized there. I had a similar problem with a loop in rexx where I forgot to supress pushing the result of a function call into shell.
(did "somefunction()" instead "call somefunction()" where "somefunction()" returned stuff).

Jack

Edit: added spaces as per Elwood's suggestion(10x)
Edit2: looks like I was in a great need for coffee when I wrote, tosally mistyped quotation tags, fixed


Edited by Jack on 2008/9/8 23:33:12
Edited by Jack on 2008/9/9 9:08:09
Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top
Re: JXFS - slow...missing a vital part?
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
@Jack





Yes, using a buffer of 10MB doesnt change a thing.
Seems to be the "unoptimized(?)" copy routines present in
C:Copy(???), anyway, all problems went away when using only
ASyncWB copy ... great work so far, i LOVE this update :clap:

People are dying.
Entire ecosystems are collapsing.
We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.
And all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth.
How dare you!
– Greta Thunberg
Go to top
Re: JXFS - slow...missing a vital part?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@Raziel

Quote:

Yes, using a buffer of 10MB doesnt change a thing.
Seems to be the "unoptimized(?)" copy routines present in
C:Copy(???), anyway, all problems went away when using only
ASyncWB copy ... great work so far, i LOVE this update :clap:


I was always under impression that c:copy should be faster than it's WB counterpart.
Maybe that's the reason for the stutters? Maybe it (c:copy) pushes the f/s to stress the cpu?
Probably the Wizards of OS4.1 only can shed some light.
I hope it'll be solved (I do most of file management in the shell).


Jack


Edited by Jack on 2008/9/7 22:58:19
Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top
Re: JXFS - slow...missing a vital part?
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
@Jack

Could you add a space character somewhere in the arguments line (FROM/M....). It breaks the layout of the browser (well under Chrome at least).

@Raziel

you need diskcache.library.kmod in your kicklayout file.
Also, your partition must be set with blocks of 512 bytes.

Philippe 'Elwood' FERRUCCI
Sam460ex 1.10 Ghz
http://elwoodb.free.fr
Go to top

  Register To Post

 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2023 The XOOPS Project