@Raziel

Here are my settings for m3u and TuneNet

Hi all,

It seems now that my A1 is finally heading towards it's resurrection, so I would like to know this:

is the KVR133x72rc3/512MB ram is known to work in pairs in A1XE?
(paired with the similar 512 or 256 stick)
There are kingston chips on it.

TIA
Jack

@Billsey

I called, I talked. They didn't say that they do not sponsor. The woman who I was spiking with talked to her manager who didn't say: No we don't support. Why?

Different "source" from people who disagree with LDI and their "list":

http://www.tamebay.com/2007/07/should ... nd-beliefs.html#more-1396

I will give some fragments here:

* In addition to matching employee donations and various grant programs, more than 13,000 nonprofit organizations in the U.S. and U.K use eBay Giving Works (or eBay for Charity) to raise funds. eBay Giving Works is eBay?s dedicated program for compassionate commerce on eBay. The program enables sellers to donate proceeds from their eBay listings directly to the causes they care about. eBay Giving Works also enables nonprofit organizations to raise funds directly through online charity auctions. Planned Parenthood is just one of more than 13,000 nonprofit organizations that use eBay Giving Works and to date the eBay Community has given more than $100 million dollars to a wide range of worthy causes.

If you call abortion charity and worthy cause, we don't have to talk about that. Creating possibility to kill someone, this is taking part in the murder.

So, now you have your TWO sources?? Or I should send you my name, address, size of, than you will "trust"?

Your search method are very poor...

God be with you,

@abalaban

Trying again from a closed TuneNet, nothing happens

TuneNet opens up, but sits there, no playlist in it's main
windows (that explains why it's restarted the song again)

Could you post your AWeb settings for TuneNet, please?

@joerg

Thanks for the info.

I checked and sfsquery shows all of the partitions have end offset == start offset of next partition. HDToolBox also shows that there are no overlaps of start and end cylinders. Check4gb reports no problems, but it cannot check LBA48.

Mask is set to 0x7FFFFFFE, and MaxTransfer to 0x0001FE00.

Only sdh8 is partially over the 128GB boundary, so formatting sdh6 should not affect sdh7 and vice-versa????

Here are the results of sfsquery followed by:
1. sfscheck sdh6 (first bad block 5247 if format sdh7, first bad block 5248 if format sdh8)
2. sfsformat sdh6
3. sfscheck sdh7 (first bad block at end of partition) and sdh8 (first bad block at start of partition).

I would attach, but I don't know how. I will point Elbox to this thread.

4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfsquery sdh6:
SFSquery information for sdh6: (SFS Version 1.276)
Start/end-offset : 0x00000001:f83f0000 - 0x0000000e:78538000 bytes
Device API : NSD (64-bit)
Bytes/block : 512 Total blocks : 104860224
Cache accesses : 102 Cache misses : 36 (35%)
Read-ahead cache : 8x 8192 bytes (Copyback)
Flush timeout : act. 20s - inact. 0.5s
Max Name Length : 107
DOS buffers : 80
SFS settings : [RECYCLED]
4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfsquery sdh7:
SFSquery information for sdh7: (SFS Version 1.276)
Start/end-offset : 0x0000000e:78538000 - 0x0000001a:f8680000 bytes
Device API : NSD (64-bit)
Bytes/block : 512 Total blocks : 104860224
Cache accesses : 36 Cache misses : 14 (38%)
Read-ahead cache : 8x 8192 bytes (Copyback)
Flush timeout : act. 20s - inact. 0.5s
Max Name Length : 107
DOS buffers : 80
SFS settings : [RECYCLED]
4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfsquery sdh8:
SFSquery information for sdh8: (SFS Version 1.276)
Start/end-offset : 0x0000001a:f8680000 - 0x00000025:1e3bc000 bytes
Device API : NSD (64-bit)
Bytes/block : 512 Total blocks : 85125600
Cache accesses : 51 Cache misses : 18 (35%)
Read-ahead cache : 8x 8192 bytes (Copyback)
Flush timeout : act. 20s - inact. 0.5s
Max Name Length : 107
DOS buffers : 80
SFS settings : [RECYCLED]

4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfscheck sdh6: 400 lock
Partition start offset : 0x00000001:f83f0000 End offset : 0x0000000e:78538000
Surfaces : 24 Blocks/Track : 252
Bytes/Block : 512 Sectors/Block : 1
Total blocks : 104860224
Device interface : NSD (64-bit)

Checking RootBlocks
...okay
Checking AdminSpaceContainers at block 2
...okay
Checking NodeContainers at block 7
...okay
Checking ObjectContainers at block 3
...okay
Checking Bitmap at block 34 (26216 blocks, 4000 bits/bitmap)
Incorrect block type at block 5248. Expected was 0x42544d50 but it was 0x53465300.
...error in bitmap block at block 5248
...damaged
4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfsformat drive sdh6: name Games
Press RETURN to begin formatting or CTRL-C to abort:
4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfscheck sdh6: 400 lock
Partition start offset : 0x00000001:f83f0000 End offset : 0x0000000e:78538000
Surfaces : 24 Blocks/Track : 252
Bytes/Block : 512 Sectors/Block : 1
Total blocks : 104860224
Device interface : NSD (64-bit)

Checking RootBlocks
...okay
Checking AdminSpaceContainers at block 2
...okay
Checking NodeContainers at block 7
...okay
Checking ObjectContainers at block 3
...okay
Checking Bitmap at block 34 (26216 blocks, 4000 bits/bitmap)
...okay
4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfscheck sdh7: 400 lock
Partition start offset : 0x0000000e:78538000 End offset : 0x0000001a:f8680000
Surfaces : 24 Blocks/Track : 252
Bytes/Block : 512 Sectors/Block : 1
Total blocks : 104860224
Device interface : NSD (64-bit)

Checking RootBlocks
Incorrect block type at block 104860223. Expected was 0x53465300 but it was 0x42544d50.
...damaged
4.SystemBack3:check4gb> sfscheck sdh8: 400 lock
Partition start offset : 0x0000001a:f8680000 End offset : 0x00000025:1e3bc000
Surfaces : 24 Blocks/Track : 252
Bytes/Block : 512 Sectors/Block : 1
Total blocks : 85125600
Device interface : NSD (64-bit)

Checking RootBlocks
Incorrect block type at block 0. Expected was 0x53465300 but it was 0x42544d50.
...damaged

@Kreciu

Hearsay means that you hear and you say (you are repeating what you have heard without independent verification), but don't provide any independent corroborating evidence. That means that as far as another person can tell, it might not be true. Remember, the Bible calls for the testimony of two or three witnesses?not just one person repeating what they've been told. That is still only one witness. Give me more that I can independently verify. The page you gave does not give a specific reason for boycotting them, it just says to boycott them. Even using search engines I could find no independent corroboration of what you have said about Paypal. That is not sufficient cause for me to act. Just because one person says something bad about someone?no matter how intensely they might believe it?does not make that bad thing true.

@Raziel

No it seems you have to close TuneNet once you launch it a first time with the stream. In other words it does not play another playlist after a first one (it is via Aweb)

@Akiko

In fact Jean-Jacques Boulet (AmigaCenter France) has the
abilities, so does Max Tretene (and his team), it's just
that either the partd or the machinery is missing
(leaving out the factor of time/costs et al)

@Raziel

Quote:

Looks so, compare:

ppc604e
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:IBM_PPC604e_200.jpg
vs.

ppc601 (non-BGA)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:IB ... 01_PPC601FD-080-2_top.jpg

Jack

Edit: replaced the 604 link with the one from wikipedia for consistency's sake.

@abalaban

Well, i had the same erraneous bahaviour and now i can't
access the stream at all, it worked before and it works
with every other stream i tried.
TuneNet doesn't even fire up when clicking on it

/me thinks of a broken html...?

EDIT:

If a song is played (stream or file) it just goes back to
that song when i click the link (after a short break), so
i'd pretty much point to a broken html (regarding the stream)

@Calgor

Quote:Check the partition start and end offsets in the output of SFSQuery or SFSCheck, it sounds like the partitions are overlapping. If everything is correct the end offset of sdh6 should be the same as the start offset of sdh7 and the end offset of sdh7 the same as the start offset of sdh8 (if they are in that order on the HD without gaps or other partitions between them).

If that's not the problem and these 3 partitions are not inside the first 128 GB of the HD it's probably a bug in the LBA48 code of FastATA, but if that's the case and it's writing to wong sectors in LBA48 mode writing to any partition which is (partitally) after the first 128 GB can destroy all partitions, incl. the ones inside the first 128 GB. Even if SFSCheck reports no errors that could have happened already, if unused or data blocks were overwritten SFSCheck can't detect it.

Quote:No.

Quote:0x42544d50 ('BTMP') is the identifier for the bitmap?blocks, they are stored near the beginning of the partition.

I've often wondered if anyone has ever had their cyberstorms 604e successfully replaced.
Anyone know if this has been done before?
What company or individual would have the necessary skill today to carry out this work presuming it's even technically possible of course!

@Billsey

Hearsay... this organization is WORKING to find out about that thinks. If you go to web site you will see HOW they do this. Everything is checked.

Answer me that question:

If this is just hearsay, why some organizations are canceled from list when they officially stop supporting PlanedParenthood??


Why the PayPal didn't tell me, when I called them: NO, we DON'T support PlanedParenthood?? But they spend 1 hour talking that they fill sorry about losing so good costumer :).

You, DO NOT have to trust anybody, your choice. I can say that I do not trust you, when you say that you are against abortion... Prove me wrong. It's a trust in someone other work to... like in Amiga OS4 I wait for this 7 years... just a hearsay, maybe.

@Joerg

Just my luck that 1.275 had that AmigaOS3.x formatting problem. With 1.276 i can get most partitions to work except for one (sdh6:) which seems to work, but SFSCheck reports it has an error.

For example I have 3 partitions with problems, the rest are fine - sdh6:, sdh7:, sdh8:

If I format with SFS in order sdh6 sdh7 sdh8, then sdh6 reports problem, but sdh7 and sdh8 are okay.

If I then format sdh6, then sfscheck on sdh6 reports no errors, but sdh7 and sdh8 then do have problems even though I didn't do anything to them!

I can repeat these steps and sfscheck always fails on the same blocks within each respective partition (middle of sdh6, rootblocks of sdh7 and sdh8).

At the moment, I am leaving sdh6 with the error and all partitions are remembered on reboot and "seem" to have no problems.

Are there any other tools other than sfscheck I can use to verify the partitions?

EDIT: Also, why is sfscheck expecting or finding block type 0x42544d50? Is that the sfs data block type identifier?

@mike

Thanks for the hint, although i already asked JJB about that
possibility and he denied.

I have yet to determine if it's a problem with getting a
new PPC chip and/or JJB not having the machine to do the
work (Am i right to think the PPC chip is a BGA one and
would need "reballing"?)

I'd think it's the latter one as JJB can do magic with a
soldering iron (proof to be my refurbished AOne - now with
working USB and on-board AC97 sound chip)

Anyway, i did ask Max (Tretene) too and his answer was:
Quote:
well, sounds not as positive as the G3 fixing statement
from ACube's website. but hey it's not a "never" either.

@Rudei

Try changing the battery first. Bring it round next weekend if you like and I'll give it a kick

Chris

@abalaban

I had exactly the same problem trying to hear some radio from France Musique... Only the introduction of the "?mission" was there, then nothing more. I had to hear it with my win*** laptop and record it with the Amiga through a cable...

Luca

naaah nevermind

We urgently need some people willing to test the upcoming AmiKit 1.4.0 release, please.

Requirements:
* Windows XP or Vista OR Linux
* Able to download 100+ MB quicky
* Time to test and write bugreports in next 2 weeks

Send an email or PM if you're interested. Thank you very much.

@Outcast

Actually, I prefer year/month/day, just as it is.