Forums - All Posts - The Amigans website

Forum Index

Board index » All Posts (sTix)

Bottom

« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 7 8 ... 12 »

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/7/19 22:43 #81

Just popping in

@Raziel

Forgot; was the fix (that I believe someone did) in gdb itself, or in the kernel? In other words, is it available for mere mortals?

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/7/19 22:40 #82

Just popping in

@Raziel

Yes. I haven't tried it myself yet (since gdb didn't work at all on X5000 when I looked at it last time, but someone fixed something since then if I remember correctly?), but '-gdwarf-4' should work.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/7/19 17:03 #83

Just popping in

@DStastny

Aha, then I understand. I thought that message came up when building adtools, hence my confusion. Indeed, our binutils is very old so unfortunately it's necessary to use -gdwarf-version when building with gcc 11 if one wants to use gdb.

I hope you succeed with LLVM, it would be very nice to have.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/7/19 14:04 #84

Just popping in

@DStastny

That's strange. I get nothing like that when building. That llvm thing is especially strange. What host OS are you using?

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/7/17 19:12 #85

Just popping in

@DStastny
Quote:

Thanks I will clone from your repo.

It's better if you use the main repo, sba1/adtools, instead of my fork. The main adtools repo is using my clib2 fork. It's a bit confusing, bit it's the least bad we could do since PR:s for the main clib2 repo take to long.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/7/17 13:53 #86

Just popping in

@DStastny
Quote:

Checking in on best approach to getting a cross compiler up that supports std:max_align_t. Does sba or sodero for k currently support and do I need to build a more up to date cLib as I know newlib does not support this

The answer is yes and yes.

If you follow the adtools guide and checkout and build gcc 11.1.0 it should work. It will also build my clib2 fork which is needed for c++11/17/2a.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: GDB

Posted on: 2021/6/18 8:10 #87

Just popping in

@kas1e

Great news!

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

Posted on: 2021/6/3 22:30 #88

Just popping in

@Raziel

Thanks for testing. Indeed, -fanalyze is hungry, not something for every write, compile and test iteration.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

Posted on: 2021/6/2 12:51 #89

Just popping in

@Raziel

I just used that release as a dump for the binaries. 11.1.0 contains everything that 10.3.0_2 does. It's a mess that I should fix. I see that there's a Travis file in the adtools repo, but it seems broken. That should be fixed so that we could build rc:s, finals and so on and automatically publish them somewhere.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10 and 11

Posted on: 2021/6/1 18:44 #90

Just popping in

If anyone would like to try 11.1.0 out, a build can be found here:

https://github.com/sodero/adtools/releases/tag/10.3.0_1

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/26 20:23 #91

Just popping in

@Capehill

Nice. I opened a PR in the main repo for gcc 10. There was some confusion in that thread as to why this release works. Would be good to avoid that in the future :)

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: AmigaGuide - embedded pictures possible?

Posted on: 2021/5/25 14:25 #92

Just popping in

@trixie
Quote:

I still think AmigaGuide is a good solution for program documentation and help: fast and slick, unlike viewing HTML in a browser. Would be great to see further improvements in the format.

I agree, AmigaGuide is perfect. I'd like to compare it with the man pages of *nix systems. I don't think offline HTML makes sense at all.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: GDB

Posted on: 2021/5/23 19:46 #93

Just popping in

@trixie
@Raziel

I wouldn't mind donating HW, but I really think it should be handled by a company or some other entity not made out of flesh and blood. Private donations can be a bit, I don't know how to put it, sensitive I guess. I think it's important that it's a no strings attached thing, no implicit expectations, otherwise I think people will be reluctant to accept it.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: GDB

Posted on: 2021/5/23 12:31 #94

Just popping in

@alfkil
Quote:

Thanks for taking my code seriously. It is definetely of paedagogical interest if not otherwise. It is also meant as a gift. If I had a machine, I would continue the work myself, but sadly I don't. Good to see the wheels running in here.

Are you saying that you don't have any OS4 hardware? If so, it shouldn't be like that. Someone should fix it.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/22 11:52 #95

Just popping in

@Raziel

Very good to hear. I'm finally preparing a PR for the main repo now so that we'll have less confusion and maintenance in the (hopefully no so distant) future.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/21 20:30 #96

Just popping in

@Raziel

Excellent :)

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/21 17:26 #97

Just popping in

@Raziel

Ok, I just did a blind build while at work. A haven't tested it at all so take it for what it is, it might kill your cat and steal your car:

https://github.com/sodero/adtools/releases/tag/10.3.0_2

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/5/18 20:55 #98

Just popping in

@Raziel

I'll see if I can get some time to do this during the weekend.

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/4/16 20:03 #99

Just popping in

@IamSONIC
That's strange, I have no clue. I'll need to take a look.

@Raziel
What other switches aren't working?

Topic | Forum

sTix

Re: gcc 9 and 10

Posted on: 2021/4/16 10:20 #100

Just popping in

@jabirulo

Yes, code density seems to have gone up slightly. I would be interesting to do some performance benchmarking as well but that's a bit to ambitious for me. I just assume that newer is better.

Topic | Forum

Top

« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 7 8 ... 12 »