Who's Online |
79 user(s) are online ( 39 user(s) are browsing Forums)
Members: 2
Guests: 77
Lio, amigait,
more...
|
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB2.8 rocks !!
|
Posted on: 2008/9/6 16:34
#41
|
Just popping in 
|
@spotUP Perahps making a donation could help: see, you've got an iconify button/menu item in 2.8  . Bye, TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB 2.7 is better than Google Chrome!
|
Posted on: 2008/9/6 12:25
#42
|
Just popping in
|
@joerg
Thanks for the iconify stuff, much appreciated (as the rest of improvements).
Next step: authentification.
Keep the excellent work.
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB 2.7 is better than Google Chrome!
|
Posted on: 2008/9/5 0:28
#43
|
Just popping in
|
@xeron
Humm.
My wife says that she doesn't need OWB2.7 and an AOne to park a car. But I wonder why there are so many scratches on her car...
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Another Open Source web browser to port :-)
|
Posted on: 2008/9/5 0:20
#44
|
Just popping in
|
@Elwood Quote:
Elwood wrote:
Chrome is the Firefox killer.
FF3 is so slooow compared to Chrome. Wow, in 6 months for now, we won't hear FF mentioned anymore....
You should really think twice, or at least read more, before writing such cristal-ball sentence. I suggest you begin with this link for example, and then go to this other one.Then rethink. Bye, TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB 2.7
|
Posted on: 2008/9/4 19:39
#45
|
Just popping in
|
@Rudei
There is a new version coming soon.
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: New Theme for Amigans.net
|
Posted on: 2008/9/3 14:23
#46
|
Just popping in
|
@Mikey_C
Humm, you had a hard work replacing the * with 4.1 in the javascript, didn't you? -;)
I like the theme btw -:)
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB 2.6
|
Posted on: 2008/8/28 22:11
#47
|
Just popping in
|
@joerg
So let go for the iconify feature then ;
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB 2.6
|
Posted on: 2008/8/26 21:20
#48
|
Just popping in
|
@joerg
I know. I already sent you for SFS2.
The question is how. When I program ARexx (AWNPipe), iconify is just a matter of adding a 'i' in the window parameters.
For OWB, I don't know.
For example, if I request an iconify button, an ARexx port (AWeb commands), and an editable context menu (right click scriptable ?-la AWeb), how much do you evaluate the work?
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OS4 Classic 1024x768 Issue
|
Posted on: 2008/8/25 21:29
#49
|
Just popping in
|
@badgerme
I had this pb with Update3 IIRC, when setting 1920x1200 outputed really 1600x1200 on the screen. A pb in the driver, corrected in update4, I suppose ?
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Usermanual for Delfina DSP Lite
|
Posted on: 2008/8/25 21:09
#50
|
Just popping in
|
@johnfante
From top to down:
Output left
Output right
Input left 1
Input right 1
Input left 2
Input right 2
On my v1.2, this is written directly on the PCB (LOUT, ROUT, etc).
So, you have to connect the audio output of your Amiga to the Input 1 or 2 and the Output to yours speakers. Easy.
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB 2.6
|
Posted on: 2008/8/25 13:57
#51
|
Just popping in
|
@joerg
Great work!
How I have to donate to have an iconify button & menu?
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Does OS4.1 have...
|
Posted on: 2008/8/12 22:21
#52
|
Just popping in
|
... minimal scanner support?
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/17 20:33
#53
|
Just popping in
|
@jahc Quote:
jahc wrote:
@thread
WookieChat has an ARexx port, but its very buggy. I copied nearly all of AmIRC ARexx commands, and gave them an additional "NETWORK" parameter to make it work nicer with multiple networks.. It's disabled by default. Read the docs for
That's good to know ;) The NETWORK parameter seems very interesting. Quote:
info on how to enable it. The only missing functions from AmIRC's implementation is stuff concerning DCC I think.
Arg, my scripts rely mainly on the DCC stuff, arg :( Quote:
ARexx did work fine for me when I last used it, but then I made small changes here and there in my code, and now I dont know if it still functions. I should really look into it. It never really worked that well in the first place though..
Well, as I said earlier I cannot ask for anything, but if you have time to digg in it, I will be very happy to test ;) Anyway thanks for the info about the ARexx port of WookieChat. Bye, TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/17 20:26
#54
|
Just popping in
|
@ssolie Quote:
ssolie wrote:
@TMTisFree
Quote:...Second it does not crash, it throws DSI error and works fine after ignoring it.
That is not correct. What you have done it put the application into an indeterminate state. Since AmigaOS is not a memory protected operating system you have also put your entire system into an indeterminate state. The DSI means the program is broken. The "Ignore" button is not a feature to make broken programs suddenly work fine. We should all be clear on this.
That's semantic for me, sorry: so, my system is in an indeterminate state most of the time and the Ignore button makes running AmIRC fine after the DSI error. That's what I need. Bye, TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/16 22:18
#55
|
Just popping in
|
@LiveForIt
First it is AmIRC. Second it does not crash, it throws DSI error and works fine after ignoring it.
@Hans
I think that is too much work to do (the ARexx port) only for my personnal use. I cannot ask for that to WookieChat author.
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/16 14:54
#56
|
Just popping in
|
@joerg Quote:
joerg wrote:
@TMTisFree
Quote:
TMTisFree wrote:
@Rogue
Any improvement in error managment, ie option to autoreboot on error (I work 1000km away from home and when an error occurs it's problematic for me to reboot...),
.KEY args/F
Reboot FAST SYNC
Ah, thanks for this tip, this should help a lot ;) Quote: Quote:option to transparently ignore (DSI) error, etc?
I ask because it is becoming boring to click every time to ignore DSI errors of ancien-and-not-more-supported-but-yet-usefull programs I use every day. Yes it is launched from CLI but I am not sure for the same process: it is when I use the ARexx port that AmIRC throws the DSI error, really not sure if this is the same process. Anyway thanks for your offering ;) Bye, TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/15 18:39
#57
|
Just popping in
|
@Rogue
Any improvement in error managment, ie option to autoreboot on error (I work 1000km away from home and when an error occurs it's problematic for me to reboot...), option to transparently ignore (DSI) error, etc?
I ask because it is becoming boring to click every time to ignore DSI errors of ancien-and-not-more-supported-but-yet-usefull programs I use every day.
Anyway good work.
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Wanted Ctorrent Betatester[V1.1 is out]
|
Posted on: 2008/4/22 13:34
#58
|
Just popping in
|
@Antique
I second Sundown here, hardly readable. Could you set the boxes as readonly instead of disabling them, perhaps?
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: Posting a file comment
|
Posted on: 2008/4/22 13:25
#59
|
Just popping in
|
@sundown
Yes and a tooltip on all the buttons/checkboxes would be more accessible for everyone.
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
|
Re: What to display with Ranger?
|
Posted on: 2008/4/17 14:03
#60
|
Just popping in
|
@ssolie
As said Jack (hi ;), the listview isn't really readable when full of objects: an alpha sorting at start or possibility to sort the listview should enhance readability, I think.
I like the SysInspector approach in this kind of tool.
Bye,
TMTisFree
|
|
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." (Napol?on Bonaparte)
"I would love to change the world, but they won?t give me the source code." (Unknown)
|
|
|
News feed
OS4 Feedback forum
OS4Depot Feedback forum
Amigabounty forum
OpenAmiga forum
AmiCygnix forum
ABC shell forum
AmiKit forum
Cinnamon Writer forum
CodeBench forum
Digital Universe forum
Dopus 5 forum
E-UAE forum
Gnash forum
Ibrowse forum
JAmiga forum
Odyssey forum
OWB forum
Qt forum
SmartFileSystem forum
Timberwolf forum
TouchDevice forum
TuneNet forum
Unsatisfactory Software forum
