Remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Who's Online
56 user(s) are online (37 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 55

pvanni, more...
Support us!
Recent OS4 Files
Report message:*

Re: Do we have an execpl replacement?

Subject: Re: Do we have an execpl replacement?
by broadblues on 2018/2/21 11:07:03



There a way to create those function grabbing them from https://github.com/sba1/clib2 or this would be too messy?

Clib2 license allows you to do so as far as I understand it. It wouldn't be messy unless you did it messily.

However, if you need to extract largish lumps of clib2 to add to your port you should consider actually linking against clib2 instead of newlib.

What kind of thing are you porting? If it needs shared object support for mosule loading etc then you are somewhat stuck with newlib, but other wise there's no reason not to use clib2, and can quite a few reasons *to* do it.

abc-shell and the core-utils are linked against clib2 for good reason, for example. (Command argument handling, libunix function requirements etc etc)

Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2016 The XOOPS Project