Who's Online |
86 user(s) are online ( 59 user(s) are browsing Forums)
Members: 1
Guests: 85
joerg,
more...
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Filing 110-111 posted
|
Posted on: 2008/7/9 15:13
#221
|
Not too shy to talk 
|
@Atheist Quote:
Atheist wrote:
Does Bill McEwen own 10% of all that was bought from Gateway 2000? He paid Hyperion with a personal cheque. I could see that as the ONLY reason he hasn't been thrown out yet.
Does Bill McEwen (still) work for the mysterious Amino Developments LLC? Just what have they developed recently, anyway?
What happened to the Kent Arena deal? How about the PPC computer that was supposed to be released/sold in Dec. 2007?
It's an "Amiga OS" and yet NO company official addresses us on ANY Amiga message boards. Are they THAT busy????
Do they own even ONE (micro)AmigaOne?
If all (and more) of these strange goings-on could be brought up in the trial, I don't think Amiga Inc. could stand any chance of winning whatsoever.
you do realise that none of this has anything to do with amiga inc vs. hyperion, dont you ? *edit* also the amount of wrong information in your post is staggering. i hope everyone realises you are making questions mostly, not statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Filing 110-111 posted
|
Posted on: 2008/7/5 23:48
#222
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mikey_C
hyperion posted their counterclaim, and amiga are responding to it. i dont think kinsel will reply again to it.
point 1 - if hyperion dont own the trademarks, how can they sue amiga for not owning them?
point 2 - if hyperion want to persue the 2001 contract section 2.07, and quote it themselves, they must then be bound by what it says, and it says the amigaone partners get stuff in case of bankruptcy, not just hyperion. they need to join eyetech in the case to get things for the amigaone partners in the contract.
the rest is just variations of this really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Hyperion Hold'em with Trademark wildcards
|
Posted on: 2008/3/1 21:04
#223
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Atheist
and there's me thinking that Hyperion should pay their own bills to make what they were contracted to do, silly me!
are you seriously trying to make me believe that even with the contract, Hyperion are allowed to charge Amiga Inc all the development costs? if that is to believed why have there only been a few full time developers over the past 5 years? why didnt they get a whole team of full time developers and have this all done in the correct timeframe they agreed on in the contract?
also, are you telling me that hyperion never agreed to the $25000 fee? even though it *is* in both contracts they signed? what about the ITEC contract then, can you tell me how that isnt a complete purchase of everything Hyperion have on OS4?
just because you dont like it, doesnt make it untrue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Hyperion Hold'em with Trademark wildcards
|
Posted on: 2008/2/27 10:44
#224
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Atheist
hyperion asked for $25000, in both the 2001 contract, and the 2003 contract with ITEC, so therefore we should assume that they want $25000, not over 2 million, yea?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ps3 experience
|
Posted on: 2007/12/29 12:01
#225
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Raziel Quote:
Raziel wrote:
@Cyborg
Will get one, when they release another batch of backward
compatible consoles (sold out in Europe(?), till then i'll
have my ps2 and be happy with it).
Europe will only get more backwards compatible consoles if they find a batch somewhere. they will not make any more. rumours are that in a few years they will have finished their software ps2 emulator and have that as a firmware update, just like the ps1 emulator now. Quote:
also i'm waiting for the best action-adventures/adventures
yet to hit the market 
so thats uncharted then 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ps3 experience
|
Posted on: 2007/12/29 11:57
#226
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Antique
get Uncharted. it has consistantly had very high marks, with most reviewers saying it is the best PS3 game there is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ps3 experience
|
Posted on: 2007/12/29 11:55
#227
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@ChrisH
The PS3 version of the orange box is not as good as the 360 version, which again is not as good as the PC version. Valve would not touch the PS3 with a very long pole, so EA had some of the in-house guys do it with help from valve.
Portal has become something of a phenomenon, but the story of half-life 2 brings me back for more. can't wait for ep 3!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: RAID and AmigaOS 4.0
|
Posted on: 2007/11/2 12:19
#228
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@salass00 is there a program for hard drives to test read/write speeds and seek times for os4? windows equivalent http://www.hdtune.com/ although it has health check stuff as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: For Sale Today (OS4 Capable Hardware) 22nd Oct 2007
|
Posted on: 2007/10/22 20:05
#229
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mikey_C 1st link doesnt work, try this one instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Your avatar!
|
Posted on: 2007/10/19 21:42
#230
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Helge
moo ?
edit - thats 2 for south park ! heh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Request to AOS4 Developers
|
Posted on: 2007/10/10 21:48
#231
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@pjs
if they (developers) did not get paid for their work (once os4 is for sale and hyperion is making money for example) then that page might be a suitable comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: iTunes Downloads
|
Posted on: 2007/7/31 20:04
#232
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@acefnq i believe it is the same place that the music is stored, and that is defined in the prefernces. or you could do a folder search for 'itunes'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: iTunes Downloads
|
Posted on: 2007/7/30 23:15
#233
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@acefnq
from wikipedia
'On September 12, 2006, the resolution of video content sold on the iTunes Store was increased from 320x240 (QVGA) to 640x480 (VGA). The higher resolution video content is encoded as 1.5 Mbit/s(minimum) Protected MPEG-4 video (H.264) with an min. 128 kbit/s AAC audio track.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: IntuitionBase ??
|
Posted on: 2007/7/19 13:06
#234
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@abalaban
its just showing a blank page here too. web server issues?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mesa 7.0 is released
|
Posted on: 2007/7/3 9:21
#235
|
Not too shy to talk
|
from http://www.mesa3d.org/Mesa 7.0 is released. This is a stable release featuring OpenGL 2.1 support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: please vote for The Sweet
|
Posted on: 2007/6/22 12:40
#236
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@AmiGame Quote:
AmiGame wrote:
That's sweet ! 
Jerry
Dude! what does mine say?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Access Denied: Amiga Inc loses first stage
|
Posted on: 2007/6/14 14:31
#237
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mitch
one mans 'extra development' is another mans 'delayed product'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Access Denied: Amiga Inc loses first stage
|
Posted on: 2007/6/14 14:30
#238
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mitch Quote:
Mitch wrote:
@derfs
Quote:
that isnt what he said. there is no clear case for them to win, and to always err on the side of caution, of the status quo, which he has done. that is different than saying they will lose.
(1) a strong likelihood of success
on the merits;
it cannot be said that plaintiff has demonstrated a strong likelihood of success on
the merits. The motion for a preliminary injunction may be denied on this basis alone.
as i said 'no clear case for them to win'. doesnt mean they cant win, or will lose (which is what you incinuated) Quote:
Quote:
Hyperion have always been able to do whatever they wanted.
Not from a legal perspective. Hyperion, assuming the contract is valid in full faith and without providing notice required that it had been breached they were only licensed to ship for the target hardware. It is in the contract.
i agreed with you, and now you disagree with your own point? its because they can do what they want that they are being taken to court.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Access Denied: Amiga Inc loses first stage
|
Posted on: 2007/6/14 11:47
#239
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mitch Quote:
Mitch wrote:
What grounds was the injunction denied on?
He talked about probable success. This means that is Amiga Inc likely to win on the following prerequisite points required for them to win overall. The judgement is that at this time, no, they aren't:
that isnt what he said. there is no clear case for them to win, and to always err on the side of caution, of the status quo, which he has done. that is different than saying they will lose. Quote:
What can Hyperion do now?
There is a lot of claims that Hyperion are in the same position as they were before. Not true. It has been clarified by the court that they have freedom of action until the court dispute is resolved. At no point did the court say "no harm, no fault". So lets reverse the injunction phrases to see what Hyperion can do now. As I was expecting at least point from the injunction 1 to be served on Hyperion, it was quite a shock to me.
*snip*
So while some are claiming that Hyperion can now still only sell AmigaOne based OS4, this is not true.
The contract limitations due to the Judges own ruling is in doubt and he does not think that Amiga Inc will probably succeed based on the evidence before the court.
Hyperion have always been able to do whatever they wanted. all thats happened is that they have not been told to stop *now*. The court case is ongoing, and if amiga.inc win, then they will claim damages if hyperion sell anything, especially to what they were never entitled with in the original contract. Realise that these are companies, and what you are promoting is the same as when certain community members promoted AmigaDE + games + SDKs. look at the laughing stock that became.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Hyperions Gloves are off
|
Posted on: 2007/5/24 9:52
#240
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Raziel
i think the ideal thing is for amiga.inc to get back everything, and then sell it to someone who gives a crap :) someone new who hasnt been tainted by the amiga markets.
|
|
|
|
|
News feed
OS4 Feedback forum
OS4Depot Feedback forum
Amigabounty forum
OpenAmiga forum
AmiCygnix forum
ABC shell forum
AmiKit forum
Cinnamon Writer forum
CodeBench forum
Digital Universe forum
Dopus 5 forum
E-UAE forum
Gnash forum
Ibrowse forum
JAmiga forum
Odyssey forum
OWB forum
Qt forum
SmartFileSystem forum
Timberwolf forum
TouchDevice forum
TuneNet forum
Unsatisfactory Software forum
