Remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!


Who's Online
71 user(s) are online (55 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 3
Guests: 68

mrupp, kas1e, BSzili, more...


Report message:*

Re: Cmake and adtools

Subject: Re: Cmake and adtools
by alfkil on 2021/9/7 17:38:13


I of course understand, that there are cases, where dynamic linking is the only option. I was a little too quick on the trigger, but also my statement was more a reminder to myself, that it sometimes helps the advancement of intent to limit the number of unknown factors. I simply thought that on top of feeling a wee tad unfinished, the dynamic linking aspect also gives rise to potential problems such as lost symbols at shutdown, multiple possible linking objects, incongruent search paths etc. So it is very nice to work without this for the time being.

When all that is said, I am of course (of course.... ;) ) going to build Qt 6 with dynamic linking at some point to satisfy the requirement of having small (wee small) executables and also because of completeness. But before I get to that, I will like to first have a complete and congruent model for paths that might or might not preserve some built in unix aspects.

Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2016 The XOOPS Project