Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
76 user(s) are online (61 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 76

more...

Headlines




« 1 (2) 3 4 5 ... 8 »


Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/11/26 21:45
From a dying planet
Posts: 4320
@Raziel

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1266 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 3793

---> L1 <---
READ32: 4820 MB/Sec
READ64: 9637 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 4131 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 3215 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ32: 2188 MB/Sec
READ64: 2846 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 1959 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 2357 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 185 MB/Sec
READ64: 193 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 302 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 654 MB/Sec
WRITE: 667 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec


edit: updated to 0.37


Edited by Raziel on 2010/11/6 12:24:50
Edited by Raziel on 2010/11/6 19:31:07
_________________
People are dying.
Entire ecosystems are collapsing.
We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.
And all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth.
How dare you!
– Greta Thunberg
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2009/3/16 11:27
Posts: 140
I?m a litte bit curious how fast the ram- and videoram-access will be on the sam460ex with its pci-express and ddr2-ram?

I?m asking, because i want to buy the 460ex beside my sam440ep.

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Not too shy to talk
Joined:
2007/1/5 10:14
Posts: 262
@Raziel

I tried 0.35 (both A and B) and the results were pretty much the same between them (A + B) and between 0.34. It didn't crash when it reached the vmem bench, but didn't return any results either. That's on a Peg2 as I said.

edit: I tried with 0.34 again without startup and it worked. So, here's the videomem results:

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 56 MB/Sec
WRITE: 184 MB/Sec

no results with new version even without startup


Edited by Vulture on 2010/11/5 14:59:37
Edited by Vulture on 2010/11/5 15:00:23
Edited by Vulture on 2010/11/5 15:01:22
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just can't stay away
Joined:
2007/2/23 13:49
From Finland, the land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki
Posts: 1116
Here's my results:

RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: IBM PowerPC 750 CXe 2.4 @ 666 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5074 MB/Sec
WRITE: 3384 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1531 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1450 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 208 MB/Sec
WRITE: 123 MB/Sec
WRITE: 450 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 33 MB/Sec
WRITE: 100 MB/Sec

A1-SE, Sapphire Radeon 9200.

What's the difference between A and B programs ?

_________________
Rock lobster bit me, so excuse me.
X1000 + AmigaOS 4.1 FE
"Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." - Seymour Cray
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2006/12/1 12:20
From Anzio (Rome), Italy
Posts: 115
RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: AMCC MPC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 9043 MB/Sec
WRITE: 8986 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1127 MB/Sec
WRITE: 725 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 305 MB/Sec
WRITE: 494 MB/Sec
WRITE: 956 MB/Sec (Tricky)

No results from the VIDEO BUS test

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2009/3/16 11:27
Posts: 140
@m3x

wow, this looks not bad!


My results:

RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 666 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5020 MB/Sec
WRITE: 334 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 276 MB/Sec
WRITE: 326 MB/Sec
WRITE: 891 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 15 MB/Sec
WRITE: 49 MB/Sec


Why is write nearly always faster than read?

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2006/12/6 12:05
From Beverland
Posts: 184
Why do the SAM video bus benchmark look the pci bus is running at 33MHz?
I expect write speeds closer to the A1 or Peg2.

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Quite a regular
Joined:
2006/12/2 0:35
From Sydney
Posts: 698
A1-XE with 7457 CPU running at 1066 MHz.

RAGEMEM v0.34 - compiled 11/02/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1066 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 8115 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2708 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 2380 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2076 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 199 MB/Sec
WRITE: 751 MB/Sec
WRITE: 799 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 33 MB/Sec
WRITE: 162 MB/Sec


I do have an L3 cache on the CPU module, but I don't know how to enable it. I remember Alan Redhouse saying that it made hardly any difference. One of these days I must try it out.

_________________
cheers
tony
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Not too shy to talk
Joined:
2006/12/2 0:31
From Poland
Posts: 329
@m3x

Quote:

m3x wrote:
RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: AMCC MPC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none


So, we have interesting results. Anyone with AOne X1000, Friedens?

_________________
Sam440 flex 800MHz RAM 1GB R9250 128MB OS4.1 SBLive! ->
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2010/11/6 11:13
Posts: 29
Hi people!

Uploaded v0.36 on Os4depot.

Do not use v0.35 anymore, this was just a test to try some fixs: Results are WRONG.

This v0.36 got a very crappy video test, but at least it should works on all Amiga. Sorry about that, I don't actually have a lot of time. Have to wait a few days

Ah! My 3.3 Apollo is a 7455A@1.4 Ghz, that's explain the version number (UBOOT returns it to be 400 Mhz, but it runs 1400).

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2010/6/1 12:46
From United Kingdom
Posts: 228
@Crisot

Found a few differences in my system's results with this new version, for example L1 write cache seems much lower than before...

RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 733 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5374 MB/Sec
WRITE: 370 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 305 MB/Sec
WRITE: 361 MB/Sec
WRITE: 978 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 14 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2010/11/6 11:13
Posts: 29
@Daniel

Yes this happens on 440, but I still don't understand what's the problem. Maybe it's related to something in my code going wrong with 440.

Unfortunately I don't have a Sam to test... I'll have a look at memory alignment.

My goal with this update was to have a working video test, for the Sam460. L1 speed fix in next version, I hope

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Quite a regular
Joined:
2006/12/6 0:11
From Italy
Posts: 705
A1-XE / Radeon 9000 / non-ECC RAM
SetA1 settings: FASTMEM FASTCAS R2C=2 R2A=1


RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1000 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 7612 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2539 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 2291 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1991 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 248 MB/Sec
WRITE: 767 MB/Sec
WRITE: 801 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2006/12/1 12:20
From Anzio (Rome), Italy
Posts: 115
Results from v0.36:

RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC MPC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 9012 MB/Sec
WRITE: 8884 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1061 MB/Sec
WRITE: 514 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 311 MB/Sec
WRITE: 514 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1237 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 61 MB/Sec
WRITE: 202 MB/Sec

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just can't stay away
Joined:
2006/12/9 10:44
From Lyon, France
Posts: 1341
@m3x

Not bad compared to the results from a Peg2 (below) which is considered the fastest OS4 machine.

*** L1 CPU cache (32KB buffer) ***
READ: 6534.77 MB/sec
WRITE: 2157.15 MB/sec

*** L2 CPU cache, if present (256KB buffer) ***
READ: 1989.89 MB/sec
WRITE: 1739.42 MB/sec

*** MEMORY (16MB buffer) ***
READ: 135.15 MB/sec
WRITE: 796.26 MB/sec

_________________
Philippe 'Elwood' FERRUCCI
Sam460ex 1.10 Ghz
http://elwoodb.free.fr
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2010/11/6 11:13
Posts: 29
@Elwood

Hey, the fastest Os4 machine is MY Aone

Kidding.

Hum, many thanks m3x, but I see there is still a problem in the L2 write speed...

I have an idea... have to do some tests here.

EDIT:

New version:
http://crisot.free.fr/universe/files/RageMem.lha

-Now bench in 32 bits and 64 bits modes.
-Slow L1 issue should be solved.
-Added a mini "MAX MIPS" bench, just for fun (see readme about this).



RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7445/7455 Apollo 3.3 @ 1400 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 4194

---> L1 <---
READ32: 5331 MB/Sec
READ64: 10660 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 4569 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 3555 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ32: 2474 MB/Sec
READ64: 3233 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 2216 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 2792 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 233 MB/Sec
READ64: 247 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 306 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 645 MB/Sec
WRITE: 663 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec


Edited by Crisot on 2010/11/6 18:04:11
Edited by Crisot on 2010/11/6 18:06:49
   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Home away from home
Joined:
2009/7/7 4:34
From Man Cave, Canada
Posts: 2536
v 0.36 results:

RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 799 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5660 MB/Sec
WRITE: 5684 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 299 MB/Sec
WRITE: 166 MB/Sec
WRITE: 902 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 14 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

oh & updated link to new version on op

_________________
_______________________________
c64-dual sids, A1000, A1200-060@50, A4000-CSMKIII
Indivision AGA & Catweasel MK4+= Amazing
! My Master Miggies-Amiga1000 & AmigaONE X1000 !
mancave-ramblings

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Quite a regular
Joined:
2006/12/6 0:11
From Italy
Posts: 705
A1-XE / Radeon 9000 / non-ECC RAM
SetA1 settings: FASTMEM FASTCAS R2C=2 R2A=1


RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1000 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 2996

---> L1 <---
READ32: 3808 MB/Sec
READ64: 7615 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 3263 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 2539 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ32: 1756 MB/Sec
READ64: 2302 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 1573 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 1990 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 234 MB/Sec
READ64: 248 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 240 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 766 MB/Sec
WRITE: 801 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2008/9/20 23:38
Posts: 79
@Crisot

i know you wrote the program but i hope you have not finded tuned it for your system (joking).

   Report Go to top

Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Joined:
2006/12/1 18:01
From Melton Mowbray.Rural Capital of Food and Drink
Posts: 116
RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1000 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 7607 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2539 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 2272 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1985 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 190 MB/Sec
WRITE: 656 MB/Sec
WRITE: 670 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec

Radeon 9250

_________________
A1200 060/ppc Grex/Voodoo
OS 3.9

A1 G4/1Ghz born again thanks to Acube Systems.
OS 4.1 Final Edition
   Report Go to top


« 1 (2) 3 4 5 ... 8 »



[Advanced Search]



Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2016 The XOOPS Project