|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/12 22:25
#501 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/7/23 21:35 Posts: 675
|
@redfox
I have the same issue. Cheers |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/12 23:08
#502 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/1 18:01 From Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1224
|
@TiredOfLife
@redfox Did you ever start XDock? I think maybe Updater uses the AppDir feature to work out where the existing program is installed, and that is only set the first time a program is run. Best regards, Niels |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/13 0:10
#503 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/3/15 2:00 From Alberta, Canada
Posts: 355
|
@nbache
Yes, I have tried the program before, although I rarely use it. It shows up in AppDir. AppDir shows DH0:Utilities/X-Dock which is the default location on my system partition. --- redfox |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/13 0:38
#504 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/7/23 21:35 Posts: 675
|
@nbache
I do, I have it launching on startup. It's only very recently that the issue has surfaced. Cheers |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/13 1:29
#505 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/3/15 2:00 From Alberta, Canada
Posts: 355
|
@broadblues
Regarding X-Dock, I was having trouble figuring out how to make a transparent background for the X-Dock. I have used a transparent background for my AmiDock for many years, and like that effect. Found out today on page 5 of this thread that I have to enable compositing effects to see a transparent background on X-Dock. Quote: AmiDock uses real transperency since AmigaOS 4.1 (no updates...) X-Dock looks nice with a transparent background, but compositing effects chew up alot of video ram on my MicroA1 system. The MicroA1 has an onboard Radeon 7000 chip and only 32 MB of video RAM. There is no way to upgrade this system. I disabled compositing effects a long time ago to conserve video RAM. I will continue to use AmiDock for now, because its transparent background works fine with my system. --- redfox Edited by redfox on 2020/12/13 17:29:29
|
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/13 18:02
#506 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/4 23:15 Posts: 2233
|
@redfox et al
Re Updater not finding X-Doxk, this is also true for myself. Also Tunenet and a few others, I'm really not sure what's up with that. Updater is not my responsibilty so (having other tasks) I lack the time to investigate more deeply just at the moment. Though I don't install my enhancer to sys: and many of the ones missing have hardcoded paths like SYS:Utilities/X-Dock maybe the use of appdir: has been dropped here for some reason? I'm runing Updater 53.70 but this issue is quite possibly in the database rather than the application. |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/13 18:10
#507 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/4 23:15 Posts: 2233
|
@redfox
AmiDock does not not support transparancy on systems without compositing either. What it does is take a screen grab of the screen behind it and use that blended with foreground as the fake transparency. This was developed before real transparency was available, and thus made some sense to keep it when real transparency was added. It really doesn't make any sense to spend time on this when real transparency is available on by far the majority of machines. However, you yourself can quite easily replicate this by taking a screen grab of the area behind your dock and using that as your backdrop image. |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/13 18:32
#508 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/4 23:15 Posts: 2233
|
@Raziel
Quote: @broadblues There is a WORDWRAP option in both programs (ME and NotePad) it's toggle option so whichever is set in the tooltypes can be overwritten on the command line. WORDWRAP=YES causes long lines in the file to wrapped to fit the space available. This is display option, the file itself is not modified. |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/14 18:08
#509 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/3 23:51 From France
Posts: 445
|
Here wordwrap does not work and I dont see WORDWRAP in the options :
10.DH0:Utilities/MultiEdit> MultiEdit ? SCREEN/S,PUBSCREEN/K,FONTNAME/K,FONTSIZE/K/N,CHARSET/K,PORTNAME/K,PRTUNIT/K/N,WINDOWLEFT/K/N,WINDOWTOP/K/N,WINDOWWIDTH/K/N,WINDOWHEIGHT/K/N,WRAPBORDER/K/N, SCROLL/S,TABSIZE/K/N,DIRECTORYSCAN/S,SINGLEFILE/S,TOOLBARON/S,TOOLBAROFF/S,FILELISTERON/S,FILELISTEROFF/S,TABS/S,NOTABS/S,OPENALLTABS/S,FILE/M: in icon tooltype I only have WRAPBORDER=76 but txt files are not wrapped at all, and if I add WORDWRAP=YES in the icon tooltype, it does nothing... using ME v1.13 |
|
|
Re: Enhancer Bug thread |
Posted on: 12/14 18:21
#510 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/4 23:15 Posts: 2233
|
@Lio
Er sorry NotePad is WORDWRAP MultiEdit uses the SCROLL option. Disable that tooltype to enable the gadget wrapparround. The reasone for the different tooltype is that MultiEdit also support wordwrap as you type, which is a different feature. |
|