Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
136 user(s) are online (97 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 136

more...

Headlines

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (Jack)




Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Mrodfr

Quote:

Mrodfr wrote:
@Jack

What is the goal, finally ???


On previous releases I had some other responsivness-related issues with certain apps, switching the dislpay to ethernet's I address cured the issues.

@LiveForIt
Quote:

The loop back is always 127.0.0.1 on all computers, 127.0.0.1 is computers local address.


Yes. And cygnix (for obvious reasons ) defaults to display bound to localhost(=127.0.01). It can be bound to either local network interface. See paragraph above for reasoning behind the proposed test.

Jack

Go to top


Re: Reinstall OS4?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@magic

Quote:

magic wrote:
@thomas

The word "Reinstall" Is an invention made by Micro$oft.
Its the same with "Reboot" "DeFrag".


You forgot the "Reformat"

Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Mrodfr

Quote:

Mrodfr wrote:
@Jack

Quote:

Just shooting in the dark: can someone with Sam to set Cygnix/DISPLAY env var to IP:0 (in env:, not envarc: where IP is your ethernet card's IP address and test for speed of local X11 apps?Jack


on sys:prefs/env-archive/Cygnix/DISPLAY
the content of the file is localhost:0.


localhost is a loopback interface.
The test is to use the address of your network card if youre connected to some lan (including adsl/cable modem).
Typically it is 192.168.something or 10.something.
Use "c:shownetstatus" to figure it out.

Jack

Go to top


Re: The Amiga Samba Support Thread
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Mikey_C

the smbfs link in the troubleshooting section is missing, and there's a comment about removed file one section above that is seems relevant to the link....

And I think that keeping up with the latest Olaf's release of smbfs from sourceforge should be permanently plastered there as a requirement (that. for example, solves issues with linux' hosted filesystems under samba server>=3.2)

Besides that guide is great starting point.

Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@broadblues

Quote:

broadblues wrote:
@Jack

Quote:

What apps are you using.


Mainly Firefox + flash at the moment as my linux inxtall has been really stripped


This is slow. Firefox is much slower on AmiCygnix than Seamonkey.

Quote:

also Cheese WebCam Booth.
Both work better via X type connections under linux, (when compared to VNC).


These two are probable slow too.

Quote:

I also access remote shells more easily via VNC rather than ssh (except that I start VNC via ssh) as it easier to use sh with a unix console. This is usually for starting remote blender renders on the slightly faster machine.


That depends on terminal window. Tabs-capable ones can reduce the number of windows.Xfce4-terminal and gnome-terminal behave reasonably.
And vinced shell +extended vt setup can do the trick using native amiga window,

Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@cygnusEd
Quote:

@Jack

Quote:
Xorg's radeon driver has 2d acceleration, and xorg itself has some extensions to do the job faster (that are not present in AmiCygnix due to older version).

Hmm - but when I use this driver, I have to hijack the gfx card? Or am I wrong?



Xorgs radeon driver relies on kernel's radeon driver. When kernel driver isn't loaded, xorg set up explicitly with radeon won't start. Edit: yes it hits the card directly. takes one of virtual consoles.

What we need is extensions.
AmiCygnix:
BIG-REQUESTS
DOUBLE-BUFFER
LBX
MIT-SHM
MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
SECURITY
SHAPE
SYNC
XC-APPGROUP
XC-MISC
XIE

Xorg on x86:
BIG-REQUESTS
Composite
DAMAGE
DOUBLE-BUFFER
DPMS
Extended-Visual-Information
GLX
MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
MIT-SHM
MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
RANDR
RECORD
RENDER
SECURITY
SGI-GLX
SHAPE
SYNC
TOG-CUP
X-Resource
XAccessControlExtension
XC-APPGROUP
XC-MISC
XFIXES
XFree86-Bigfont
XFree86-DGA
XFree86-DRI
XFree86-Misc
XFree86-VidModeExtension
XINERAMA
XInputExtension
XKEYBOARD
XTEST
XVideo


Imho, "damage" extensions would help, and so "render"

Jack

Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@cygnusEd

Quote:

This is a problem of the window manager "OpenBox". The window manager is responsible for the way windows are moved. OpenBox only supports opaque movements. You could switch to "mwm" (Motif Window Manager). He uses a frame for window movements, but he is less comfortable. Use myX11Setup for this.

I have a new window manager here: The Equinox Window Manager. He is a bit faster than OpenBox and supports also frame movements. Maybe you like to test it?


Once upon a time there was amiwm - looked like workbench 2.0
Simple than mwm

Anyway, jokes aside, one could make a minimastic environment with mwm+toolbar if he/she doesn't care tweaking text configs andtoolbar inability to display amything othern than xpm icons.

About Equinox: I would like to have a ride too

Keep on doing the great job with AmiCygnix!

Jack

Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Tread

Just shooting in the dark: can someone with Sam to set Cygnix/DISPLAY env var to IP:0 (in env:, not envarc: where IP is your ethernet card's IP address and test for speed of local X11 apps?


Jack

Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@broadblues

Quote:

broadblues wrote:

Quote:

Comparing speed of X11 to VNC isn't ``fair''. It is like comparing playback of movie on two devices, while 1-st uses framedrop (vnc) and othe struggles to draw every frame (X11).


Hmm but in the linux to linux situation

debianx86_Xclient to debianppc_Xserver

is much faster than

debianx86_Xclient to debianx86_XVNC to debianppc_vncviewer

That could be because XVNC is loading the p3 server in addition to the app.



In case of client on its local xserver displayed via vnc on remote machine there are 2 gotchas:
the xserver that is displayed via vnc is totally virtual and can be slowed only by lack of resourses (ram/cpu), but I bet that's not the case, what leaves the other one: it depends on the client. There are clients that will benefit from being transferred over X11 and other clients will suffer.
Client that has complex gui will be slower via X11 (see complex kde apps, browser displaying complex pages, any app that has to redraw images) while VNC performance is affected by amount of damage to the display and its settings (low compression will cause higher network traffic)
Also, apps that query for fonts will start up slowly on remote X11 servers.


Quote:

I don't expect AmiCygnix to go as fast as linux, I just need to to be faster than VNC to be of use to me.


What are the apps you are using?

Quote:

But I was under the impresion that DebianPPC on the A1 did not have h
hardware accelaeration enabled? (Or is that only 3d accel that's missing).


Xorg's radeon driver has 2d acceleration, and xorg itself has some extensions to do the job faster (that are not present in AmiCygnix due to older version).

Quote:

The important point about the comparison though, is that is not that X11 is faster than AmiCygnix but that X11 is faster than VNC thus a potentially optimised AmiCygnix could also be faster. If a linux native X11 server couldn't keep up with VNC there be little point in trying optimise AmiCygnix (for this purpose).

True, and I'm optimistic

Jack

Go to top


Re: What is needed for speedup Amicygnix ???
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@broadblues

Quote:

broadblues wrote:
@Paul


Ofcourse I can just run TwinVNC under amigaos and not worry about this, but I wonder if some people are finding local apps run at an acceptable speed, perhaps it some kind of network efficiency issue? Just wondering if there is something I could tweak that might improve that aspect.


Here comes somethng that looks like pure advocacly, but I just want to state some relevant facts:
Comparing speed of X11 to VNC isn't ``fair''. It is like comparing playback of movie on two devices, while 1-st uses framedrop (vnc) and othe struggles to draw every frame (X11).
Comparing AmiCygnix to debian's xserver is unfair too (older totally unaccelerated version vs. one with accelerated 2d driver without extra software layer that exists in AmiCygnix' case. )

Native apps (sylpheed, geany) work fast. Mozilla one the other hand is slower. Gvim (remote) is very reasonable.
Some things to allow faster remote display:
stop using ssh 's X11 tunneling and use xauthority mechanism
(via "xhost +client machnine" on A1 or via "Cygnix:CygnixPPC/etc/X0.hosts" and setting $DISPLAY on client machine).


Edit: did anyone tried to experiment with bencharking with screenmode setting+ driver combinations?

Jack

Go to top


Re: Help me,issues on my Amiga One
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@MamePPCA1

Quote:

Can anybody say me what elements of the pocket may I use to mount the cooler? Screws,thermal grease,etc...


Grease is a must. A good one. Arctic silver 5 is a good start.
Decent fan (build quality) too (small fans tend to vibrate more than big).
Here A1 works well with chipset cooler with fan removed, there's 90mm fan on bracket above the heatsink and good quiet case fan. Works great (and it is hot here).

Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: Share folders between AmigaOS4.1 and Windows.
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Thread

I think this might prove itself useful (replying to myself on some other thread where the reply would be too blatantly OT), the subject is amiga smbfs by Olaf Barthel:
Quote:

With older samba servers it works. The problem is with (at least here) with samba 3.2 on linux. then the stuff gets broken. It's smbfs' fault. Smbclient implements a newer version of protocol and works fine, but it doesn't offers filesystem functionality.


Was wandering in sf.net yesterday and found that the latest smbfs works like charm with Debian's samba 3.3.4 server! No 8.3 capitalized filenames and mount failures! Yipeee!


Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: OWB 3.13
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Chris

Quote:

Chris wrote:
@Jack

Quote:
As it seems, dynamic loading of .so files or related issue haunts python bundled with OS4.x).


It appears as if the dyamic linker is only waiting a certain amount of time, and then passing control to the program before (checking) all the shared objects are loaded.


This isn't what I exerienced here. to reproduce:
open owb

open cygnix, launch leafpad or sylpheed

open os4 python in shell (nothing seems to be busy at that point)
sometimes importing somethig in python is needed to trigger the isi


Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: OWB 3.13
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Joerg,


The browser gets better and better. And now it is finally main browser here (solved cl(r)ashes with python and X11 stuff by installing a custom build of python, courtesy of Edgar :^D, static python doesn't GRs when X11 apps and OWB are up. As it seems, dynamic loading of .so files or related issue haunts python bundled with OS4.x).

Some things that will improve the experience:

1. as many already requested, download manager (minimalistic one will do, status+cancellation option, doesn't have to be realtime).

2. secure connection indicator

Last note: just noticed minor corruption when doing paste, actually the region where the pasted text goes into sometimes gets refreshed after noticeable delay (5-10 seconds). Found this so far in amigans.net post edit window.


I wish I could donate larger amounts of money,
Huge thanks,
Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: FTPMount feedback
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@pvanni

Quote:

nice to see you are improving FTPMount, I use it regulary
with my NAS server because smbfs doesn't work and maybe

With older samba servers it works. The problem is with (at least here) with samba 3.2 on linux. then the stuff gets broken. It's smbfs' fault. Smbclient implements a newer version of protocol and works fine, but it doesn't offers filesystem functionality.


Quote:

FTPMount it's faster.

I think native NFS client is a must (m68k version from amitcp works fine here, but slow).
Interesting if I can dig up source from somewhere...


Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: Where are you from?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Antique

I think here is the country with least amiga users (0 doesn't count).
I know one (hopefully still active) A1 user and no active Amiga classic users (at least one of them is online).

Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: Justice for speeding Motorcycle
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Rigo

Quote:

That is very true, as most car drivers are oblivious to the fact there may be a bike somewhere close to them. If they hear it, they look twice.

And bicycle riders are pretty much doomed.
When I take the road (not everywhere pavements are wide/flat enough), I drive in the middle of the lane. Otherwice cars try to squeeze in instead of propely usung the left lane,

Jack


Edited by Jack on 2009/5/7 22:57:54
Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: vinced+ssh and more
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Snuffy

No, not vnc for remote desktoping.
Vinced is a kind of shell editor.


http://aminet.net/package/util/shell/ViNCEd

Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: vinced+ssh and more
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@Jack

Bump!

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top


Re: lpr.device
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


@abalaban

or access permissions are mis-configured (unpublished printer?).
I use lpr.device with network printer, so that's doesn't help you.
Did you set the lpr.device into "raw" mode for socket printing? (otherwise it'll fallback to lpr that requires lpd server to be installed).

Jack

Resized Image
"the expression, 'atonal music,' is most unfortunate--it is on a par with calling flying 'the art of not falling,' or swimming 'the art of not drowning.'. A. Schoenberg
Go to top



TopTop
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 40 »




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2023 The XOOPS Project