Who's Online |
152 user(s) are online ( 122 user(s) are browsing Forums)
Members: 0
Guests: 152
more...
|
|
Headlines |
-
mce.lha - game/utility
Apr 23, 2024
-
theme_list.lha - utility/misc
Apr 23, 2024
-
faac.lha - audio/convert
Apr 22, 2024
-
faad2.lha - audio/convert
Apr 22, 2024
-
seq.lha - audio/misc
Apr 22, 2024
-
libfaac.lha - development/library/audio
Apr 22, 2024
-
libfaad.lha - development/library/audio
Apr 22, 2024
-
image2pdf.lha - utility/text/convert
Apr 22, 2024
-
libharfbuzz.lha - development/library/graphics
Apr 20, 2024
-
libpng.lha - development/library/graphics
Apr 20, 2024
|
|
|
|
Re: Amigans.net Featured Donations July 2008
|
Posted on: 2008/7/11 9:26
#261
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@K-L Quote: I just precised that I already donated and that I will do it again (by the way, you never confirmed the fact that I said you something even if I wrote you 2 mails asking for good reception). I don't understand what you're trying to say.. What does asking for good reception mean? Whenever I receive a donation I reply and say thanks. Are you saying I missed your donation email?
|
|
|
|
Re: Amigans.net Featured Donations July 2008
|
Posted on: 2008/7/11 4:41
#262
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@K-L Quote: I have to donate but there is so many people to give some money:
Rogue Jahc (I sent him 20$ US last year) Spot-Up (even if I **hate** the "Port For Profit" term) Varthall Joerg Mason AfxGroup Bean (I sent him 11? last year) EvilRich and all those who develop some very useful tools or addictive games
We cannot give all our salary to them (even if I'd like to ).
Right now, I can't afford to give money to any of them wihle I'd really like since there are many softwares from them I use daily.
When I have more money, I'll be glad to offer them money for their great work I hate to say it, but I think everyone that wanted to donate in the past 3 years has done it by now. So we're relying on people making 2nd and 3rd donations now..
|
|
|
|
Re: Amigans.net Featured Donations July 2008
|
Posted on: 2008/7/10 12:51
#263
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mikey_C
I think it just shows that the community isnt big enough right now to support this kind of initiative.. it was a good idea though.
|
|
|
|
Re: Filing 110-111 posted
|
Posted on: 2008/7/9 12:51
#264
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Atheist Quote: I stand by the prediction of Hyperion Entertainment winning this case, in totality. I've dissected Amiga Inc. Del.'s opening paragraph which is on Justia's page (the one that lists all the documents) on another, ahem, website and it has no credibility whatsoever. Do you really believe Hyperion are going to win? Or do you merely *want* them to win? I want them to win too, but I have a feeling this case could go either way.
|
|
|
|
Re: Amigans.net Featured Donations July 2008
|
Posted on: 2008/7/8 7:57
#265
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@thread
3 donations so far.. and one of them was huge ($50 usd!). Thanks guys, its good help for me while I dig myself out of my financial hole. :)
|
|
|
|
Re: Filing 110-111 posted
|
Posted on: 2008/7/4 13:58
#266
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mikey_C
Amiga Inc argue that Hyperion cannot get AmigaOS, because the clause in the contract states it will go to the AmigaOne partners, which is Hyperion AND Eyetech. The question is, can the judge let the AmigaOne partners have it, both Hyperion and Eyetech, even though Eyetech is not a party in this suit? This seems to be the show stopper to me. But I'm not too good with this legal talk, I just like to make widdle pieces of software.
|
|
|
|
Re: YAM 2.5 Problems (and how I fixed them)
|
Posted on: 2008/6/23 12:36
#267
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@thomas
Oh okay. I didn't know that.
Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|
Re: YAM 2.5 Problems (and how I fixed them)
|
Posted on: 2008/6/23 10:41
#268
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@thomas
Whoops!
I'd like the question answered anyway,for my 68k projects. :)
|
|
|
|
Re: YAM 2.5 Problems (and how I fixed them)
|
Posted on: 2008/6/23 8:42
#269
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@tboeckel
But doesnt the stack cookie only work on OS 3.5 or higher?
|
|
|
|
Re: xMAME and screen resolutions
|
Posted on: 2008/6/3 4:04
#270
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@MamePPCA1
Oh I understand your issue now. Your screens arent centered? What screen resolution is your game using? And what happens if you configure Workbench to use that screen resolution? do you get the same off center results?
EDIT: I have an LG 19" LCD monitor too. You have to go into the menus to adjust your position/width settings.
|
|
|
|
Re: xMAME and screen resolutions
|
Posted on: 2008/6/2 3:32
#271
|
Not too shy to talk
|
If you're referring to the Capcom 6 button beat'em ups, they require you to enter their funny resolutions into your monitor driver... I used to have about 10 different custom modes, but I've lost them in a recent OS reinstall.. but for example, one of them was:
MODE=384x224@70
Run your games in windowed mode and you'll see their screen resolution. Write it down and enter those into your monitor tootltypes, reboot, and test if they work.
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/20 1:53
#272
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@acefnq Quote: So why bag Wookie? Or better still why comment on this thread? Why not encourage the author of Wookie rather than just condemn. I really do not get your logic. Dont worry about it.. most IRC users are very picky about what they use to IRC with. :)
|
|
|
|
Re: Can 1,000,000 NatAmis Be Sold? YES!!
|
Posted on: 2008/5/18 8:20
#273
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Atheist
haha, amigans.net is refusing to drink your glass of Crazy.
|
|
|
|
Re: Any hope for DVI out support in OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/17 14:21
#274
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@thread WookieChat has an ARexx port, but its very buggy. I copied nearly all of AmIRC ARexx commands, and gave them an additional "NETWORK" parameter to make it work nicer with multiple networks.. It's disabled by default. Read the docs for info on how to enable it. The only missing functions from AmIRC's implementation is stuff concerning DCC I think. ARexx did work fine for me when I last used it, but then I made small changes here and there in my code, and now I dont know if it still functions. I should really look into it. It never really worked that well in the first place though.. @person who said it looks like mIRC You can configure Wookie to make it look like AmIRC/XChat.. i.e. multiple columns in the chat display, and graphical representations for operater/voice status beside peoples nicks in the nicklist. http://wookiechat.amigarevolution.com ... eenshots/main_display.png
|
|
|
|
Re: What are the top apps/utilities/games for OS4?
|
Posted on: 2008/5/11 9:59
#275
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Monoxyde
What? SabreMSN is highly reccomended? it's no better than any other MSN option for Amiga currently.. but dont worry, I'm going to work on it. :)
|
|
|
|
3d Games with Software rendering
|
Posted on: 2008/5/8 8:26
#276
|
Not too shy to talk
|
I have a gfx card that doesn't have supported 3d. Does anyone know which of the Quake games on os4depot.net support software rendering? Ideally I'd like to give Quake 1 and 2 a whirl.. but I dont want to track down/buy the discs just yet until I know what will work for me.
|
|
|
|
Re: Heretic II problem. - i'm stumped with new WarpOS wrapper.
|
Posted on: 2008/4/4 2:04
#277
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@Mikey_C
a1ide sounds wrong to me... go into Media toolbox. This will bring up a list of available devices and tell you exactly what the device name is.
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB need REALY not much RAM -> REALITY CHECK INSIDE
|
Posted on: 2008/3/24 10:18
#278
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@joerg Quote: I got most of OWB working without allocating memoroy for the complete pages/frames, but not everything (for example the selection borders around text input and textareas are wrong), i.e. it has even more display errors than the normal version ... 1. Is this a change that will benefit other platforms too? (besides Amiga?) 2. How much memory will be saved? (for example) 3. Will this change potentially make it easier to implement some form of tabs?
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB (1.17) bugs and feature requests
|
Posted on: 2008/3/11 3:39
#279
|
Not too shy to talk
|
@TSK
I know, I use it. But it still lets the gif anims play once before they stop. I want an option to not play them at all, because even when they play once and stop it takes a while for some forum pages to become usable. :)
|
|
|
|
Re: OWB (1.17) bugs and feature requests
|
Posted on: 2008/3/10 8:03
#280
|
Not too shy to talk
|
Feature request: Can you add the option to totally disable gif anims? On some forums it takes a while for a page with a lot of gif anims to become usable..
|
|
|
|