News feed
OS4 Feedback forum
OS4Depot Feedback forum
Amigabounty forum
OpenAmiga forum
AmiCygnix forum
ABC shell forum
AmiKit forum
Cinnamon Writer forum
CodeBench forum
Digital Universe forum
Dopus 5 forum
E-UAE forum
Gnash forum
Ibrowse forum
JAmiga forum
Odyssey forum
OWB forum
Qt forum
SmartFileSystem forum
Timberwolf forum
TouchDevice forum
TuneNet forum
Unsatisfactory Software forum
|
The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.
| Author | Thread |
|---|---|
| kas1e |
Published: 2011/6/19 8:27 Updated:
2011/6/19 8:27
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 09/11/2007
From: Russia
Comments: 8950
|
 Re: Introducing GfxBench2DPretty interesting !
Btw, as you say that X1950 pro are the best from your tests, should to add, that by all the gallium3d tests which i see on linux: x1950 are one of the fastest as well. |
| sofistisoftware |
Published: 2011/6/19 9:04 Updated:
2011/6/19 9:04
|
|
Just popping in
Joined: 01/01/2007
From: Latina, Italy
Comments: 209
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D Thanks Hans ! A very nice and useful prg
|
| Elwood |
Published: 2011/6/19 9:43 Updated:
2011/6/19 9:43
|
|
Just can't stay away
Joined: 12/09/2006
From: Lyon, France
Comments: 1364
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D The GFX card industry has moved to supporting 3D only.
Anyway, it reminds me of an ancient deal with Matrox  |
| treke |
Published: 2011/6/19 11:09 Updated:
2011/6/19 11:09
|
|
Just popping in
Joined: 02/07/2009
From:
Comments: 13
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D Hm, are you sure you don't have a bug on the web?
The 'GfxBench2D Benchmark: ATI Radeon X1950 pro' says: Operating System (OS): AmigaOS Release 4.1 - Update 3 Produced by Hyperion Entertainment CVBA |
| kas1e |
Published: 2011/6/19 14:43 Updated:
2011/6/19 14:47
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 09/11/2007
From: Russia
Comments: 8950
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @elwood
Quote:
In our case , when we have p96 gfx subsytem, and all our progs and stuff based on many 2d functions from p96/cybegraphics/cgraphics/intuition - we still need those 2d functions. As Rogue says : they want to migrate fully to 3D after gallium will introduced (i.e. making compositing via gallium), and in general there will be nothing hard, to redirect all the code from our system-2d functions to 3D layer. But right now its imho for sure not important, and thinking about replacing everything GFX related in amigaos via 3D its to early :) @Treke Update3 for now in betatesting and preparation for release , so, betatesters already have update3, and maybe its just some betatester with update3 running do the tests. |
| Antique |
Published: 2011/6/19 15:32 Updated:
2011/6/19 15:32
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 11/30/2006
From: Norway
Comments: 2618
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D Seems like i have droppen down to 3rd.
 HeheNice work Hans.  |
| TSK |
Published: 2011/6/19 16:26 Updated:
2011/6/19 16:26
|
|
Just can't stay away
Joined: 02/23/2007
From: Finland, the land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki
Comments: 1201
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D SiliconMotion 502 is the slowest (at the moment). But then my A1-SE is the slowest machine on the whole list with both gfx cards.
(Classic users were testing with lower resolutions so maybe they're slower anyway.) |
| derfs |
Published: 2011/6/19 17:16 Updated:
2011/6/19 17:18
|
|
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 11/27/2006
From: UK
Comments: 277
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D im presuming that sam460 at the top is Hans
|
| derfs |
Published: 2011/6/19 17:23 Updated:
2011/6/19 17:23
|
|
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 11/27/2006
From: UK
Comments: 277
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @Hans
The Next result down/up links do not work when looking at individual results. missing 'benchmark' in the URL. |
| djrikki |
Published: 2011/6/19 22:20 Updated:
2011/6/19 22:20
|
|
Quite a regular
Joined: 05/16/2010
From: Grimsby, UK
Comments: 950
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D SAM 460ex results, Radeon HD 4650
http://hdrlab.org.nz/Benchmark/GfxBench2D/Result/71 I hope this is 'drool' worthy enough kas1e :D |
| Hans |
Published: 2011/6/19 22:26 Updated:
2011/6/19 22:26
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 01/26/2007
From: New Zealand
Comments: 2673
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @kas1e
Quote: @Treke Correct. Some of those results are mine. @derfs Quote: im presuming that sam460 at the top is Hans No, that's someone else. My Radeon X1950 pro test takes up spot number two in the rankings. Quote:
Oops, not sure how I missed that. It's fixed now. Thanks for letting me know. Hans |
| kas1e |
Published: 2011/6/19 22:31 Updated:
2011/6/19 22:31
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 09/11/2007
From: Russia
Comments: 8950
|
Re: Iurntroducing GfxBench2D @djrikki
Worthy enough now only x1950 pro :) In 3 times faster that your current one :) |
| djrikki |
Published: 2011/6/19 23:06 Updated:
2011/6/19 23:06
|
|
Quite a regular
Joined: 05/16/2010
From: Grimsby, UK
Comments: 950
|
Re: Iurntroducing GfxBench2D You speed freak/geek ;p
|
| treke |
Published: 2011/6/20 6:19 Updated:
2011/6/20 6:19
|
|
Just popping in
Joined: 02/07/2009
From:
Comments: 13
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @kas1e, Hans
Thanks, gotcha. I was hoping for this answer :) (i've seen comments that U3 is being prepared, but not that is being tested) So you can spill a bean. What in U3 is related to gfx improvement, so it is worth to test ? |
| kas1e |
Published: 2011/6/20 9:19 Updated:
2011/6/20 9:19
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 09/11/2007
From: Russia
Comments: 8950
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @treke
Quote:
As i know, in update3 will come new version of rtg.library with different kind of improvements, one of which, is some kind of DMA-related speedup for SAM machines (dunno, if it will make sense for peg2/a1). And just by checking update3 results and update2 from hanz site, i see that for update3 are uses: Quote:
While for update2: Quote:
So, every library related to tests was revised few times each. But of course, will be cool to see list of what exactly was changed in every library beetwen versions in the update2 and update3. |
| sofistisoftware |
Published: 2011/6/20 11:10 Updated:
2011/6/20 11:22
|
|
Just popping in
Joined: 01/01/2007
From: Latina, Italy
Comments: 209
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D it's not correct the most recent version would be:
exec.library 53.16 graphics.library 53.5 intuition.library 53.32 Picasso96API.library 3.1 <--- rtg.library 42.1 <--- the DMA implementation on Sam machines and in the rtg.library as Max said on italian forum: From two test at the first place (Sam460ex + X1950 Pro) #1(http://hdrlab.org.nz/benchmark/gfxbench2d/Result/37) and #2(http://hdrlab.org.nz/benchmark/gfxbench2d/Result/4), you can see the difference with or without the DMA activated, where the first one, the MemCopy shows a peak of 730 MB/s using WritePixelArray, while a peak of 190 MB/s in the second without DMA activated, there's a big difference ! Max (ACube) did a good job, thanks. p.s: on the fifth and sixth place there are my results: Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 ddr3 Sam460ex 1920×1080@60 (32 bit) 3,333.82 Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 ddr3 Sam460ex 1680×1050@60 (32 bit) 3,307.74 Regards |
| kas1e |
Published: 2011/6/20 11:13 Updated:
2011/6/20 11:15
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 09/11/2007
From: Russia
Comments: 8950
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @sofistisoftware
Interesting. So looks like hanz have just some old-first update3 beta-test version.. Related to DMA its indeed sounds cool. Strange through why new versions not listed on the "good" benchmark, and they are the same as with or without DMA. Also interesting to know, if it only SAM related DMA addon in rtg.library, or it will also have improvements on peg2 ? But so fast WPA its always cool. I imagine that SDL with update3 and with RadeonHD drivers will rockz hard. |
| Hans |
Published: 2011/6/20 11:46 Updated:
2011/6/20 11:46
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 01/26/2007
From: New Zealand
Comments: 2673
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @sofistisoftware
Quote: it's not correct the most recent version would be: Those version numbers belong to an experimental version of Picasso96 on my machine that is not synced with the trunk version. I forgot about that when I ran the tests. Hans |
| Antique |
Published: 2011/6/22 20:17 Updated:
2011/6/22 20:17
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 11/30/2006
From: Norway
Comments: 2618
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D |
| kas1e |
Published: 2011/6/22 20:47 Updated:
2011/6/22 20:47
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 09/11/2007
From: Russia
Comments: 8950
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @Antique
Not bad. Almost as x1950. Assume that with x1950 , 1920x1080 mode give 5.000.000, and your one are 1920x1200 give 4.400.000, its almost the same :) |
| Hans |
Published: 2011/6/23 1:36 Updated:
2011/6/23 1:36
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 01/26/2007
From: New Zealand
Comments: 2673
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @Antique
Quote: Results from my 4890 [url]http://hdrlab.org.nz/benchmark/gfxbench2d/Result/121[/url] That's better than I was expecting. I didn't realise that the 4890 was that much better than the 4850. It would be interesting to see how it performs using exactly the same screen-mode as the 4850 below it. ** Hans ** I'm skipping the "Radeon 4800" result because a "4800" doesn't actually exist, and we don't know which particular model it is. It would be helpful if people could submit full graphics card details using the links provided on the result page. That way we have the most accurate information possible. |
| Antique |
Published: 2011/6/23 6:50 Updated:
2011/6/23 6:50
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 11/30/2006
From: Norway
Comments: 2618
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D Quote:
That's better than I was expecting. I didn't realise that the 4890 was that much better than the 4850. It would be interesting to see how it performs using exactly the same screen-mode as the 4850 below it. ** The number 3 and 4 are made on the same machine. Quote: ** I'm skipping the "Radeon 4800" result because a "4800" doesn't actually exist, and we don't know which particular model it is. It would be helpful if people could submit full graphics card details using the links provided on the result page. That way we have the most accurate information possible. Have fixed that now. |
| Hans |
Published: 2011/6/23 8:09 Updated:
2011/6/23 8:09
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 01/26/2007
From: New Zealand
Comments: 2673
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @Antique
Thanks for submitting the Radeon HD 4850's details. Quote: The number 3 and 4 are made on the same machine. So that makes it an accurate comparison between the two. Nice. The other interesting comparison would be a test at the same resolution as the X1950 pro above it. I'm unable to repeat the X1950 test at 1920x1200 though, as my monitor goes up to 1920x1080. Hans |
| Hans |
Published: 2011/6/23 8:21 Updated:
2011/6/23 8:22
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 01/26/2007
From: New Zealand
Comments: 2673
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D @kas1e
Quote: @Antique What I find more interesting is that the X1950 is faster in 2D blits, but the 4890 makes up lost ground in the compositing tests, where both cards have to use the 3D GPU. While it remains to be seen, this suggests that the 4890 will be better for 3D. Also interesting are the peak performance results obtained when rendering large rectangles. Large blits are least affected by the PCIe bandwidth, and so gives an idea of the maximum performance that the card could achieve without that bottleneck. The X1950 pro once again beats the 4890 in peak blitter performance. However, in the compositing tests, the 4890 is leaving the X1950 pro in the dust. Hans |
| Antique |
Published: 2011/7/4 19:58 Updated:
2011/7/4 19:58
|
|
Home away from home
Joined: 11/30/2006
From: Norway
Comments: 2618
|
Re: Introducing GfxBench2D |
