|
|
|
afxgroup [image]
|
Re: Porting more interesting stuff |
|
Site Builder

|
Posts:
594
|
|
Posted on: Today 9:14:40
|
|
@Rogue
agreed.. indeed it would be the best solution. Also on Windows a lot of programs are using QT
|
|
_________________
i'm really tired...
|
Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
afxgroup [image]
|
Re: new alpha |
|
Site Builder

|
Posts:
594
|
|
Posted on: Today 9:12:35
|
|
and however 3.6 is not so stable.... and on windows it eats TONS of memory..
|
|
_________________
i'm really tired...
|
Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
Rogue [image]
|
Re: Porting more interesting stuff |
|
Home away from home

|
Posts:
498
|
|
Posted on: Today 7:47:27
|
|
@number6
My unofficial view on AmigaOS GUI toolkits ís that they all suck dead hamsters through a garden hose. Compared to modern UI toolkits from other platforms, they lack in functionality, customization features, and about everything else.
They all of their flaws, and they hardly have any strengths. Making a list of all of it would be a waste of time. Personally I consider the list of Reaction to be the shortest one, but I am quite sure MUI supporters will chime in and say otherwise. It's personal opinion anyway, so you're welcome to yours, as I am to mine.
Personally, my favorite pick for a future GUI tool kit would be Qt. It's very functional, customizable in a decent fashion (i.e. through themes, not through the exchange of every single frame, bitmap and what have you. It has good developer support, good functionality, and a GUI builder.
But I guess this is going to be "an insult to the community" again..
|
|
_________________
why bother
|
Transfer
|
|
|
|
Home |
|